Ireland's Chief Scientific Advisor Pins Climate Action Hopes on Silver-Bullet Fossil Fuel Tech

authordefault
on

Irelandโ€™s Chief Scientific Advisor believes fossil fuels still have a role in a low-carbon future โ€“ and there is money to be made ensuringย it.

Late last year, Professor Mark Ferguson, a medical doctor and dentist with no Earth science qualifications, provoked a controversy in addressing Irelandโ€™s parliamentary committee on climate action, when he stated: โ€œas a scientist, I am optimistic. Climate change is a big problem and a big issue but I remind you that no crisis that was ever predicted in human history has come toย passโ€.

In an interview this week with Desmog, Ferguson defended these comments, adding: โ€œthere is, of course a crisis and I acknowledge that, but you need to give people hope that they can do something about it. If you overwhelm people and say, this is a terrible crisis, and thereโ€™s nothing to do, then youโ€™re unlikely to get the mitigation action that you want, and youโ€™re very unlikely to get people to respond in terms of doing whatโ€™sย requiredโ€.

Asked about his comments to the parliamentary committee defending continued fossil fuel burning, he stressed that he was โ€œtalking about carbon capture (CCSCO2โ€.

When pressed on whether he thought wide-scale CCS could ever be economically or technically feasible, given decades of false starts, Ferguson appeared unclear, replying: โ€œwe need to encourage significant research in thisย areaโ€.

While Ireland has completely missed its 2020 EU carbon reductions targets, Ferguson stated that the governmentโ€™s new Climate Action Plan was designed to address this. When asked if he believed this plan could get Ireland on track for its 2030 targets, he replied: โ€œI have not done theย numbersโ€.

He declined to discuss the specifics of government climate policy with Desmog, stating: โ€œif you want to talk about policy, you should talk to the people in the department and with the experts in that area; I am not going to say anything about any individual piece because Iโ€™m not well briefed or well qualified to doย soโ€.

Individual change not systemย change

Ferguson believes that effective climate action is about small steps taken by individuals as well as technological solutions, with the need for policy changes rarely discussed in any detail. In a recent RTE radio interview, Ferguson focused instead on what he saw as the money-making potential in climate change: โ€œthere are whole new industries that will do good for the planet and actually make money forย peopleโ€.

Fergusonโ€™s views appear to closely echo the general luke-warmist approach of the Irish government on climate action, with Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar keen to talk up personal actions but notably reluctant to press for changes that would discomfit politically powerful lobby groups such as the agri-industrial sector, whose emissions continue to spiral.

Varadkar recently controversially spoke of the possible upsides of climate change, such as fewer deaths from cold during the winter. Comments he later clarified, acknowledging they could be subject to โ€œmisinterpretation by those who may be pursuing a climate scepticย agendaโ€.

Asked to comment, Ferguson stated: โ€œI think what the Taoiseach was trying to do was to try and provide some encouragement to people. I understand why that is, because there are quite a lot of studies that talk about climate anxiety, people are kind of paralysed, they feel they canโ€™t do anything aboutย itโ€.

Holding the purseย strings

In addition to his role as science adviser to the government, Ferguson also heads Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), the grant-giving body that dispenses some โ‚ฌ170 million in research funding annually. Since taking over this role in 2012, Ferguson has shifted SFIโ€™s focus to largely supporting research funding that is likely to make aย profit.

Ferguson spent much of his career at the University of Manchester, from where he set up a private biopharmaceutical company, Renovo, to commercialise his research. However, having raised and spent over โ‚ฌ100 million, the company failed and all investor funding, including ยฃ20 million of UK taxpayerโ€™s money, was lost. However, Ferguson and his wife made over โ‚ฌ12 million in exercising share options when shares peaked in 2007. Ferguson also received over โ‚ฌ4.5 million in salary while headingย Renovo.

When questioned in 2012 as to his suitability to head up Irelandโ€™s grant-giving science agency, given the Renovo fiasco he spearheaded, Ferguson replied: โ€œlots of others involved sold shares and lots of investors made hundreds of millions. I wasnโ€™t the only one who madeย moneyโ€.

Ferguson isnโ€™t the only figure with a chequered financial history ready to suggest the most economically optimal path to a low-carbon society. Hereditary peer, advisor to the UK climate science denial campaign group the Global Warming Policy Foundation, and former Northern Rock chairman Matt Ridley is similarly ready to ignore his fiduciary failings when pushing his โ€˜optimisticโ€™ view of technological solutions to the climate crisis. The collapse of the Northern Rock bank in 2007 marked the starting point of a prolonged financialย crisis.

The governmentโ€™s decision to allow Ferguson to fill the dual roles of heading SFI while also government chief scientific adviser was criticised at the time by a number of senior scientists, who pointed out the likely conflict of interest that would arise. โ€œWe are now in a situation where a person holding the purse strings to science is giving the government advice on how it is fundedโ€, according to Prof James McInerney of NUIย Maynooth.

Prof Stefano Sanvito of Trinity College, Dublin warned that the most likely outcome of the appointment is that Ireland will effectively no longer have a Chief Scientific Adviser. Asked by Desmog if he felt it was appropriate that he holds the two positions, Ferguson replied: โ€œAbsolutely; as I said before, I do not give personal scientific advice โ€ฆ I clearly cannot be an expert in everything. I seek out the experts and introduce them to those seekingย adviceโ€.

Image credit: Science Foundationย Ireland

authordefault
John Gibbons is a Dublin-based specialist writer and commentator on climate and environmental issues. He blogs at ThinkOrSwim.ie. You can follow him on Twitterย @think_or_swim.

Related Posts

on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.