New BP CEO Ends 'Greenwashing' Ad Campaign

authordefault
on

BPโ€™s new CEO Bernard Looney made a big announcement this week, saying he wants to โ€œreinventโ€ the company and ensure it has โ€œnet-zeroโ€ย carbon emissions by 2050.ย ย ย 

But alongside such headline-grabbing statements about the companyโ€™s future was a little-noticed changeย with moreย immediate impact โ€“ that the company will cease its โ€œPossibilities Everywhereโ€ย advertisingย campaign.

And not only that, it will also revise its relationship with lobbying groups that it believes are not taking the climate crisis sufficientlyย seriously.


Like what you’re reading? Support DeSmog by becoming a patron today!ย 


Advertisingย campaign

The โ€œPossibilities Everywhereโ€ campaign was the companyโ€™s biggest global campaign in a decade, and was the source of many complaints and accusations ofย greenwashing.

The adverts included videos and billboards, and was rolled out online, in newspapers and on social media. Focused on the companyโ€™s renewable and low-carbon energy, the adverts highlighted its solar and wind energy projects, despite 96 percent of BPโ€™s annual spending going on fossilย fuels.

Environmental lawyers ClientEarth took action against the oil company over the campaign in December 2019, reporting the company under OECD guidelines governing corporate conduct, as well as demanding BP pull its adverts. ClientEarth alleged that the company โ€œwas giving the public a misleading impression that it was focused on clean energyย investmentsโ€.

The lawyers also set up a petition calling for fossil fuel company adverts to display climate change warnings, in the same way tobacco products are required to carry health warnings. A statement on ClientEarthโ€™s website argues thatย โ€œfossil fuel companies should not be able to buy a good reputation for their climate-damaging products throughย advertising.โ€

Looney’s announcement that BP would cease the โ€œPossibilities Everywhereโ€ย campaign and not replace it was welcomed byย ClientEarth.

Climate Accountability Lead for ClientEarth Sophie Marjanac said: โ€œWith todayโ€™s announcement, BP appears to have accepted that its approach to advertising was not in line with its stated ambition of helping the world get to net zero and that it was primarily aimed at improving the companyโ€™sย reputation.โ€

The announcement to stop the campaign was generally seen by campaigners as a positive move from BP, which has spent millions improving its image, from huge global campaigns to sponsoring local science workshops in schoolsย in order to secureย a social licence to operate in smallย towns.

However, Marjanac said that more needs to be done, and other big oil and gas companies such as Shell, Chevron, Total and Exxon must now followย suit.

Lobbying

Looney also took the opportunity in his speech to announce that he will โ€œlay down the lawโ€ on what is and isn’t acceptable in BPโ€™sย lobbying.

He said the issue of lobbying is something he is โ€œvery, veryย focused onโ€, and that BP must not be seen to be saying one thing and doingย another.

BP is a member of many lobby groups, most notably the American Petroleum Institute, which according to thinktank InfluenceMap, the company has a strong relationship with. BP is also a member of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufactures, a lobby group that Shell announced it would be leaving this year due to disagreement over climateย policies.

BPโ€™s announcement has raised a few eyebrows among those familiar with the companiesโ€™ย tactics.

Belรฉn Balanyรก, a climate and energy researcher at campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory told DeSmog that she is sceptical about BPโ€™s announcement, as this is not the first time the company has rebranded. Originally called British Petroleum, it took the name BP in 2000 and introduced the tagline โ€œBeyond Petroleumโ€ in an attempt to emphasise an apparent transition away fromย oil andย gas.

Balanyรก tells DeSmog that โ€œuntil now what their track record shows is that they have kept lobbying to preserve their core business, fossil fuels. They are actually following suit in what other oil and gas companies are doing.โ€ She points to Madrid-based oil and gas company Repsol, which recentlyย announced it would be a net zero emissions company byย 2050.

For fossil fuel companies such as BP, โ€œnet-zeroโ€ is just a buzzword that they are exploiting, she says: โ€œFor oil and gas companies, net-zero means keeping burning fossil fuels while increasing a wide range of ‘false solutions’ which are at best dangerous distractions and very often plain harmful for the climate: offsets, carbon markets, carbon capture and storage, gas, forest plantationsย etc.โ€

โ€œThis is also the tune that major lobby groups are singing now, which will allow BP and others to keep membership of many lobby groups which are actively lobbying to delay, weaken or block effective climate and energy policies while saying they are aiming for climate neutrality, low carbon economy or net-zeroย emissions.โ€

Disclaimer: Sophie Marjanac is on DeSmog UK‘s Board of Directors.ย 

Image/video credit:ย BP/Youtube

Related Posts

on

Multnomah County, Oregon, says NW Natural โ€œengaged in an enterprise of misrepresentationโ€ about its productsโ€™ harm to the climate.

Multnomah County, Oregon, says NW Natural โ€œengaged in an enterprise of misrepresentationโ€ about its productsโ€™ harm to the climate.
Analysis
on

The final two Conservative candidates have worrying records on green issues.

The final two Conservative candidates have worrying records on green issues.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.