Obama's science advisor no fan of Bjorn Lomborg

authordefault
on

If the โ€œskepticalโ€ Dane Bjorn Lomborg had any standing with the White House it will quickly evaporate with the incoming Obamaย administration.

President-elect Barack Obama has chosen John P. Holdren as his science advisor – a man who was one of the most vocal critics of Lomborgโ€™s famously inaccurate book The Skeptical Environmentalistโ€.

โ€œThe Skeptical Environmentalistโ€ was so offensive to the scientific community that Scientific American published a ten-page evisceration authoured by four actual researchers, includingย Holdren.

Lomborg tried to refute this critique on his website but apparently knew so little about science that he sent a blanket email to his supporters pleading for help. Itย read:

โ€œNaturally, I plan to write a rebuttal to be put on my web-site. However, I would also love your input to the issues โ€“ maybe you can contest some of the arguments in the Scientific American, alone or together with other academics. Perhaps you have good ideas to counter a specific argument. Perhaps you know of someone else that might be ideal to talk to or get to write aย counter-piece.โ€

Holdren, wryly noted: โ€œIt is instructive that [Lomborg] apparently did not feel he could manage an adequate response by himself. (In this, at least, he was correct. But he could not manage it with help,ย either.)โ€

It looks like Obama has chosen not to take science advice from the likes of Lomborg. Sorry Bjorn. I think your race isย run.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Opinion
on

The volume of 'net zero' messaging โ€” a concept that can sometimes feel very abstract โ€”must be recalibrated to foreground the vital conversation about immediate impacts and resilience.

The volume of 'net zero' messaging โ€” a concept that can sometimes feel very abstract โ€”must be recalibrated to foreground the vital conversation about immediate impacts and resilience.
Analysis
on

A ruling that TotalEnergies misled consumers with inflated climate claims is the first court judgment against the fossil fuel industryโ€™s net zero narrative.

A ruling that TotalEnergies misled consumers with inflated climate claims is the first court judgment against the fossil fuel industryโ€™s net zero narrative.
on

In a major conflict of interest, FMinus study shows nationโ€™s climate action taking a back seat to Big Oilโ€™s lobbying playbook.

In a major conflict of interest, FMinus study shows nationโ€™s climate action taking a back seat to Big Oilโ€™s lobbying playbook.
Analysis
on

Food and farming companies will claim agriculture is the solution to the climate crisis at the Brazil summit โ€” even though food drives a third of global warming.

Food and farming companies will claim agriculture is the solution to the climate crisis at the Brazil summit โ€” even though food drives a third of global warming.