Heartland Still Misrepresenting 500 Scientists as "Co-authors" of Denial Paper

authordefault
on

The Heartland Institute is still misrepresenting 500 scientists as โ€œco-authorsโ€ of a paper that challenges the human role in global warming.

Although Heartland President and CEO Joseph Bast conceded on Monday that his organization had been wrong to present the scientists as people who personally and professionally doubted the proof of humankind’s impact on the climate, he refused to respond to the demands from dozens of those scientists to have their names removed entirely from the web-publishedย โ€œpaper.โ€

Bast said:

They have no right – legally or ethically – to demand that their names be removed from a bibliography composed by researchers with whom they disagree. Their names probably appear in hundreds or thousands of bibliographies (My emphasis: RL) accompanying other articles or in books with which they disagree.

But if you click here on the Heartland site, you get to the now-redacted original article by renowned denier Dennis T. Avery, and if you then click on the Download Full Text (pdf) button, you go to a page that DOESN‘T say โ€œbibliographyโ€ or even โ€œreferences.โ€ It says, unapologetically, โ€œCo-authors: Alphabeticalย List.โ€

To strain the point, Joe Bast might look up the definition of โ€œco-author.โ€ My Oxford says simply โ€œa joint author,โ€ while TheFreeDictionary goes the extra mile and adds the wordย โ€œcollaborating.โ€

And if it’s not clear enough yet for Mr. Bast, he might even look up โ€œcollaborator,โ€ which would get him toย this:

1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort.
2. To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation force in one’s country.
We at the DeSmogBlog have received outraged emails from six dozen of Bast’s โ€œco-authorsโ€ and we have contacted fewer than 150 out of the 500. They didn’t work on this paper; they didn’t authorize the use of their names; and they object strenuously to the spin that Avery has put on their legitimate scientific research.
In other words, none of these scientists fit the first definition of collaborator, but if you can define science, figuratively, as a โ€œcountry,โ€ Avery certainly seems to fit the bill as a collaborator in the second, cooperating with fossil-fuel funded think tanks and ideologically driven political campaigners to undermine science.
authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The Reform chair has long expressed his admiration for the DOGE chief, and is now trying to replicate his policies in local government.

The Reform chair has long expressed his admiration for the DOGE chief, and is now trying to replicate his policies in local government.
on

Farageโ€™s right-hand man has been accused of awarding himself sweeping, unchecked authority within the party.

Farageโ€™s right-hand man has been accused of awarding himself sweeping, unchecked authority within the party.
on

Australiaโ€™s Woodside approves $17.5 billion LNG project just days before Trump social services budget cuts, leaving locals facing โ€œharsh economic reality.โ€

Australiaโ€™s Woodside approves $17.5 billion LNG project just days before Trump social services budget cuts, leaving locals facing โ€œharsh economic reality.โ€
on

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.