National Post's Peter Foster: Is he suffering stupidity, venality or both?

authordefault
on

In one of his periodic diatribes against science, scientists and any risk analyst who thinks that 95% certainty is enough to cause concern about global warming, the National Postโ€™s Peter Foster has attacked Canadian scientist Andrew Weaver โ€“ using an argument that the newspaper has admitted, twice before, is flat-out untrue.

So, rude as it is to ask, we have to wonder if Mr. Foster is

a) an incredibly slow learner;

b) not a frequent reader of his newspaperโ€™s โ€œCorrectionsโ€ feature;

c) so ideologically blinded that evidence just doesnโ€™t matter to him; or

d) on the take?

There is, perhaps, a fifth answer, which to some degree gathers up some of the other four. The denial team leaders at the National Post โ€“ Peter Foster, Terence Corcoran, Lorne Gunter, Lawrence Solomon โ€“ have exhausted themselves shouting into the wind on this issue. They have spent their credibility and they have left themselves no graceful line of retreat. In fact, if any one of them now stood up and admitted that the science explaining anthropogenic global warming is overwhelming, they would become a laughingstock in their own narrow-minded community. Clearly, nearing the end of their fading careers โ€“ at their fading newspaper โ€“ they canโ€™t take the strain.

In this instance, Fosterโ€™s actual attack on Weaver is not even that compelling. Foster says the University of Victoria scientist โ€“ one of the most frequently published and widely respected climate modellers in the world โ€“ โ€œunleashed a diatribe against the research of Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre, who inconveniently exploded the IPCCโ€˜s alarmist โ€˜hockey stickโ€™ graph.โ€

Well, as the Post has been forced to admit before, Weaver did no such thing. Though many others have and to good effect. Go to RealClimate.org and search โ€œMcKitrick,โ€ โ€œMcIntyreโ€ or โ€œhockey stickโ€ and youโ€™ll find pages of criticism, pretty much all of it well taken.

Foster also says that โ€œMr. Weaver has even suggested that it is dangerous to allow skeptics a voice in scientific debate.โ€

First of all, thatโ€™s โ€œDr. Weaverโ€ โ€“ a relevant honorific that sets an esteemed Canada Research Chair apart from, say, a business writer with no expertise whatever in science. Second, and again, Weaver has suggested no such thing. As he says himself, โ€œThis statement makes no sense since by definition, real scientists are skeptics. Being skeptical is precisely how one advances science.โ€

Need it be said: Being stubborn, blind, sloppy and immune to evidence is less helpful.

PS

For strenuous determination to ignore all science and common sense, you canโ€™t beat Terence Corcoranโ€™s climate update in todayโ€™s paper, also attacking Andrew Weaver (why do they hate him so?).

Corcoran argues that an outbreak of winter weather in Toronto suggests that the entire theory of global warming is about to collapse. And he advertises the quibble-fest coming up this weekend at the International Conference on Climate Change. Check out the scientific credentials in this mob of โ€œexpertsโ€ and then think about the old aphorism: โ€œbirds of a feather โ€ฆ.โ€

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

More than 30,000 wells needed over the next 25 years for new LNG export projects, calculates renowned earth scientist David Hughes.

More than 30,000 wells needed over the next 25 years for new LNG export projects, calculates renowned earth scientist David Hughes.
on

Decision paves the way for future environmental cases in Italian courts and represents the latest EU nation to hold Big Oil accountable through litigation.

Decision paves the way for future environmental cases in Italian courts and represents the latest EU nation to hold Big Oil accountable through litigation.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith has thrown around some vastly inflated figures. Global energy forecasters arenโ€™t buying it.

Premier Danielle Smith has thrown around some vastly inflated figures. Global energy forecasters arenโ€™t buying it.
on

Conservationists warn that cancellation of thousands of tests since May will leave a โ€œregulatory and ecological blind spotโ€.

Conservationists warn that cancellation of thousands of tests since May will leave a โ€œregulatory and ecological blind spotโ€.