A Climate Change Ostrich Argues for Inaction

authordefault
onAug 17, 2006 @ 05:33 PDT

Donaldย ย J. Boudreaux , chairman of the Department of Economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., says, โ€œIt’s a perfectly legitimate stance for truly reasonable people to conclude that the best policy regarding global warming is to neglect it – and let capitalism continue to make us healthier andย wealthier.โ€

Actually, no. There is nothing legitimate or reasonable about this position, and it’s a continuing problem that mainstream media outlets keep buying this bunkum on the basis that the writer has a PhD in a field unrelated to climate change (or to common sense,ย apparently).

Tim Lambert at deltoid has a point-by-point response, which addresses the general goofiness of Boudreaux’s position. But the bottom line for all you free marketeers is this: Capitalism will only cure climate change when capitalistsย turn their creative attention toward addressingย the problem. Those who continue to deny it are missing an opportunity to make money, as well as endangering the rest ofย us.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.
onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.
Analysis
onNov 24, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.