AEI Seeks Scientists for Sale: $10,000 to First Taker

authordefault
on

Per the attached letter, the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) has been shopping for scientists who will review the coming Fourth Assessment Review (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

That’s no crime, but it’s a bit suspect when a right-wing think tank specifies exactly what the “scientific review” will discover before the scientists even sit down to start reading. AEI is looking for something that “thoughtfully explores the limitations of climate model outputs as they pertain to the development of climate policy.” (My emphasis.)

AEI says it will pay $10,000 for 10,000 words, but clearly they’re only looking for one good sentence from one accommodating academic – one line that enables them to argue that you shouldn’t use the work of the best climate scientists in the world to make policy.

As I said, what AEI is doing is no crime; but it should be.

Attached Documents

File Size
AEI_review_IPCC_AR4.pdf 417 KB
AEI_review_IPCC_AR4.pdf 417 KB
AEI.pdf 417 KB

Related Posts

on

In KTM dealerships across the continent, thousands of off-road bikes are stripped of legally-required features that restrict pollution.

In KTM dealerships across the continent, thousands of off-road bikes are stripped of legally-required features that restrict pollution.
on

By backing a right-wing Canadian conference featuring anti-climate speakers, experts warn TikTok has “abandoned” its commitments to combat climate misinformation

By backing a right-wing Canadian conference featuring anti-climate speakers, experts warn TikTok has “abandoned” its commitments to combat climate misinformation
on

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships ‘de-risk’ projects.

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships ‘de-risk’ projects.
on

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has “corrosive effects on public health debates”.

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has “corrosive effects on public health debates”.