This New Scientist feature ( Climate change: Menace or myth?) is an older piece, missing some of the big news in the last year that has bolstered the scientific consensus yet further, but it is, nevertheless, a painstakingly fair effort to weigh the arguments for and against climate change – even giving the last word to ExxonMobil’s clientย scientists.
The worldโs largest outdoor advertising company warned city councillors of โfar-reaching consequencesโ hours before the landmark vote.
For decades, ExxonMobil argued consumers, not oil giants, should take responsibility for fossil fuel pollution. Itโs now backing Carbon Measuresโ accounting scheme, which moves pollution โliabilitiesโ to buyersโ books.
For some separatists, ignoring Indigenous rights is not only a side effect of an independent Alberta, but an explicit goal.
Democratic innovation as a pathway for revitalising global climate action.
