DeSmog

Facebook-f X-twitter
Subscribe

DeSmog

Donate
Search
Search

Further Dissembling by The Australian

By James Hoggan
on

Kudos to the folks at PR Watch for tracking down this bit of info. It appears that the editors of The Australian (about whom we opined critically just a couple of days ago) have supplemented their own badly grounded science with the meanderings of an industry flak intent upon muddying the waters on the issue of climate change. Bad journalism, bad science.

By James Hoggan

Related Posts

‘People’s Rights Are Being Signed Away,’ Claim Albertans Near Proposed Carbon Capture Project
ByTaylor Noakes
on
With only two months until a $20B CCS proposal pushed by the oil industry is finalized, local communities say they haven’t been consulted.
Exclusive: Pig and Poultry Air Pollution Costs UK Over £130 Million a Year  
ByClare Carlile
on
Residents living near the intensive farms say clouds of foul-smelling pollutants can make it hard to breathe.
Series: Investigating Intensive Livestock Pollution
uk/Fossil Fuel Trade Group Chief Says Approving Rosebank and Jackdaw Would be ‘Climate Leadership’
ByAdam Barnett
on
OEUK chief slammed for ‘laughable’ claim at Labour conference.
AI Was Supposed to Cut Emissions. Instead, Fossil Fuel Companies Are Using It to Find More Oil and Gas.
BySarah Hofmann
on
A new study found AI-driven fossil fuel productivity could increase emissions. Here are examples of companies already using AI to boost production.
Series: Tech vs Climate