Kudos to the folks at PR Watch for tracking down this bit of info. It appears that the editors of The Australian (about whom we opined critically just a couple of days ago) have supplemented their own badly grounded science with the meanderings of an industry flak intent upon muddying the waters on the issue of climate change. Bad journalism, badย science.
Industry giants have been accused of โenriching shareholdersโ while โfarmers and consumers pay the priceโ.
Nigel Farageโs anti-climate party has received two thirds of its income from oil investors.
You might not have heard of them, but a new analysis shows these ad execs have overseen $1.5 billion worth of fossil fuel ads in the U.S. since the Paris Agreement.
DeSmog analysis reveals London-based WPP linked to twiceย as much oil advertising as American rivalsย despite its internal climate policy.
