Canada to Bail Out of Kyoto Agreement

authordefault
on

Conservative Party Leader (and prime minister in waiting) Stephen Harper appeared to confirm last night in a CBC interview that he will remove Canada as a signatory to the Kyoto Agreement should he win election on Monday, Feb. 23,ย 2006.

Harper argues – rightly – that Canada wasted the lastย decade while the Liberal government of then-prime minister Jean Chretien dithered over how to achieve Kyoto targets. Chretien’s biggest fear during the late ’90s was that he would further alienate Albertans, whose robust economy rests heavilyย on fossil fuels. Chretien was also denied his usual ally in Ontario, as the then-Conservative provincial government refused to participate in any negotiations on reducing greenhouse gasย emissions.

Somewhat to his credit, Chretien endorsed the Kyoto accord as an outgoing gesture. But his successor, Prime Minister Paul Martin also deserves criticism for failing to initiate any specific action that would reduce Canada’s GHGย output..

So, for the past 12 years, Canada has had a government that paid lipservice to climate change while failing to take action. Now we face a new administrationย that will join the U.S. in trying to block any fixed international targets for greenhouse gas reduction. As Mr. Harper said, โ€œIn fairness, (climate change) is not one of my topย priorities.โ€

Tooย bad.

Related Posts

on

Oil Sands Alliance's Kendall Dilling confirms that the proposed carbon capture project is more scaled back than oil producers originally advertised.

Oil Sands Alliance's Kendall Dilling confirms that the proposed carbon capture project is more scaled back than oil producers originally advertised.
on

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.
Analysis
on

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.
on

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.