California Courting Climate Change Advantage

authordefault
on

When California started insisting, in the late 1960s, that automakers clean up exhaust emissions, industry screamed at the notion, threatening that the state’s tough standards would bankrupt car owners and put the industry out of business.

Forty-odd years later, North American’s love affair with the car has reached new heights of rapture and the air in every major city is more breathable than it was in the mid-70s, despite a tripling of  the number of vehicles on the street during those years.

Now we have certain lions of industry – and certain of their political patsies – threatening economic collapse if we reduce greenhouse gas emissions to address climate change. But researchers at the University of California at Berkley say that their innovative state may, in fact reap a huge benefit by being the first to mandate and develop more efficient energy measures.

It’s a shame to see the Californians grasping one more reason to be cocky, but if their actions help turn around the climate crisis, we’ll have to all get gracous and say thank you.

Related Posts

on

Internal documents unearthed by a U.S. Senate panel show the oil giant modeled up to 500 CCS sites operating globally by 2050, far fewer than rival Shell. 

Internal documents unearthed by a U.S. Senate panel show the oil giant modeled up to 500 CCS sites operating globally by 2050, far fewer than rival Shell. 
on

But demand for hydrogen-powered vehicles remains low, and claims the gas is a net-zero technology are still unproven.

But demand for hydrogen-powered vehicles remains low, and claims the gas is a net-zero technology are still unproven.
on

The Conservative leader voted in favour of protecting the planet only 13 times in 20 years as an MP, a DeSmog analysis of his voting record reveals.

The Conservative leader voted in favour of protecting the planet only 13 times in 20 years as an MP, a DeSmog analysis of his voting record reveals.

Campaigners likened the fossil fuel company’s patronage of climate events to letting an “arsonist sponsor a fire safety conference”.

Campaigners likened the fossil fuel company’s patronage of climate events to letting an “arsonist sponsor a fire safety conference”.