Addicted to Oil: An Historical View

authordefault
on

If you Google theย phrase that sounded so explosive in U.S. Presidentย George Bush’s mouth last week, the first post you will come up with is a Dec. 13, 2001ย leader from that venerable defender of the free market, theย Economist magazine.

Sadly, while G.W.’s advisers appear finally to have read the Economist’s headline, they have not bothered to dip into the text, which warns against the inadequacies ofย government investment in alternativeย fuels andย recommends instead a carbon tax.โ€Gradualism,โ€ the Economistย said, โ€œis the key to doing this intelligently. The time to start isย now.โ€

Well, the time to start was, in fact, then, but better late thanย never.

The headline – Addicted to Oil – also made an appearance in the May 29, 2003 edition of the Atlantic magazine, over a piece written by Robert Baer, a former CIA agent in the Middle East. Baer describes the U.S. condition as โ€œa dependence so strong it’s almost like aย narcotic.โ€

There was a June 17: 2002 post on the activistย blogย AlterNet, the whole headline from which was โ€œAddicted to Oil: Confronting American’s worstย habit.โ€

And there was a Natinal Public Radio series called Addicted to Oil that began airing in Aprilย 2005.

It doesn’t matter now whether this is a case of great minds thinking alike or an instance in which the U.S. administration can no longer flee from a self-evident truth, it’s just good to see the problem front and centre on the publicย agenda.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships โ€˜de-riskโ€™ projects.

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships โ€˜de-riskโ€™ projects.
on

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has โ€œcorrosive effects on public health debatesโ€.

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has โ€œcorrosive effects on public health debatesโ€.
Analysis
on

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.
on

The Heartland Institute used the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s 2025 annual meeting to spread climate disinformation and tout coal to power AI.

The Heartland Institute used the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s 2025 annual meeting to spread climate disinformation and tout coal to power AI.