IPCC author and climate change expert hits "skeptics" hard

authordefault
on

In a Calgary Sun column today, noted atmospheric scientist and IPCC author, Dr. Andrew Weaver, slams the so-called climate change โ€œskeptics.โ€ โ€œThe enduring debate โ€“ such as it is, particularly in Alberta โ€“ over the role humans play in global warming โ€“ is so divorced from scientific literature as to be a discourse from a distant age or orbit,โ€ says Weaver. And Weaver should know, with over 150 peer-reviewed research papers published and the title of Canada Research Chair in Climate Modeling andย Analysis.

And what about notorious Canadian climate change โ€œskepticโ€ Dr. Tim Ball ? Weaver says โ€œthese adversaries of scientific knowledge haven’t had a peer-reviewed paper published in memory, and, โ€œI’ve never seen Tim Ball at any climate meeting โ€ฆ I don’t why people go to him,โ€ he says. โ€œI’d say to him: ‘why don’t you publish yourย science?’โ€

This has been DeSmog’s point all along. Let the scientists do their science and let the weight of evidence speak for itself. If Dr. Ball and others want to disprove human-caused global warming, then stop doing PR and get into a laboratory and prove yourย hypotheses.

Related Posts

on

The declaration coincides with U.S. fossil fuel companiesโ€™ use of Trumpโ€™s trade tensions and international discord to undermine EU climate laws.

The declaration coincides with U.S. fossil fuel companiesโ€™ use of Trumpโ€™s trade tensions and international discord to undermine EU climate laws.
on

Tory energy chief endorses debunked studies written by fossil fuel industry interests.

Tory energy chief endorses debunked studies written by fossil fuel industry interests.
on

Nigel Farage and his colleagues have close ties to the autocratic petrostate.

Nigel Farage and his colleagues have close ties to the autocratic petrostate.
on

The European Parliament has โ€œa legal and moral obligation to reject these dangerous proposalsโ€, according to Dutch Left MEP Anja Hazekamp.

The European Parliament has โ€œa legal and moral obligation to reject these dangerous proposalsโ€, according to Dutch Left MEP Anja Hazekamp.