Monckton fights for Exxon's freedom of speech

authordefault
onDec 20, 2006 @ 10:51 PST

Christopher Monckton, a well-known climate change โ€œskepticโ€ and British aristocrat has fired off a response to U.S. Senators Snowe and Rockefeller for their letter this fall urging oil giant ExxonMobil to cease funding to US โ€œthinkโ€ tanks that are actively involved in the PR campaign to confuse the public about climateย change.

In the letter, Monckton, who is far from being an expert on the science behind climate change, says of ExxonMobil, โ€œthat great corporation has exercised its right to free speech – and with good reason – in openly providing support for scientsists and groups that dare to question how much the increased concentration of C02 in the air may warm the world.โ€ Monckton goes on to use the regular skeptic talking points, arguing that โ€œwarmer is better than cooler,โ€ and saying there’s โ€œno evidence that today’s temperatures are warmer than during the medieval warm period 1,000 yearsย ago.โ€

Monckton’s plea to take this as a freedom-of-speech issue is risible. Corporations, ExxonMobil included, have the right to defend their interests and should do so in an open and honest manner. Exxon is falling down on bothย counts.

Instead of being open in urging that people ignore climate change, Exxon is paying other people to say something that would be laughably self-serving if Exxon executives were to say it themselves. For example, how would the public view ExxonMobil and their โ€œbiodiversity conservationโ€ program if the company also announced that it has no regard for the top scientists in the world on the most critical environmental issue of the day. In fact, how much faith would we all have in Exxon’s ability to run a safe and profitable corporation if we really believed that Exxon took its scientific advice from โ€œskepticsโ€ who couldn’t get their views published in any legitimate scientificย journal?

Exxon’s major competitors and the principal scientific bodies of the world’s developed nations agree that, where climate change is concerned, black is black. Exxon pays a hard core of โ€œthinkโ€ tanks to argue that black is, in fact white. And Christopher Moncktonย agrees.

The problem is that this kind of speech is not โ€œfree.โ€ In distracting us from addressing an issue that threatens the world in an unprecedented way, it is costing us all a price that we may never be able toย pay.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onDec 2, 2025 @ 07:48 PST

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.
onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.
onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.