AEI Looking for "Middle Ground" in Climate Debate

authordefault
on

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI ) is once again offering $10,000 payments to scientists who will comment on climate change – this time in the search for policy options that will open up a โ€œmiddle groundโ€ in the debate over climate changeย policy.

This fascinating-if-true development is reported here on the Science and Politics of Global Climate Changeย Blog.

For the record, the payment – for essays of between 7,500 and 10,000 words – is comparable to what a middling public magazine might pay for a badly researched piece of journalism. On one hand, if AEI offered more, it might hope to get more senior writers than those who contributed to the recently released Fraser Institute critique of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessmentย Report.

On the other hand, if AEI offered more, we would be even quicker to accuse them of buying science. Their only real option is to proceed in good faith. If they really want to open up a helpful discussion of reasonable policy options, it will become obvious soonย enough.

Related Posts

on

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.
Series: MAGA
Opinion
on

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.
on

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.
on

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.