AEI Looking for "Middle Ground" in Climate Debate

authordefault
on

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI ) is once again offering $10,000 payments to scientists who will comment on climate change – this time in the search for policy options that will open up a โ€œmiddle groundโ€ in the debate over climate changeย policy.

This fascinating-if-true development is reported here on the Science and Politics of Global Climate Changeย Blog.

For the record, the payment – for essays of between 7,500 and 10,000 words – is comparable to what a middling public magazine might pay for a badly researched piece of journalism. On one hand, if AEI offered more, it might hope to get more senior writers than those who contributed to the recently released Fraser Institute critique of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessmentย Report.

On the other hand, if AEI offered more, we would be even quicker to accuse them of buying science. Their only real option is to proceed in good faith. If they really want to open up a helpful discussion of reasonable policy options, it will become obvious soonย enough.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Leaders of the Alberta separatist movement are insisting they do not want to become the U.S.โ€™s 51st state, but their actions (and own words) say otherwise.

Leaders of the Alberta separatist movement are insisting they do not want to become the U.S.โ€™s 51st state, but their actions (and own words) say otherwise.
on

Opponents of climate action are taking advantage of the AI boom to attack the governmentโ€™s clean energy goals.

Opponents of climate action are taking advantage of the AI boom to attack the governmentโ€™s clean energy goals.
on

A new report has found that โ€œthe promises of planet-saving tech remain hollowโ€.

A new report has found that โ€œthe promises of planet-saving tech remain hollowโ€.
on

Emails from the hand-picked, secretive group of climate crisis deniers revealed flaws in their methods and โ€œanimusโ€ toward leading scientists.

Emails from the hand-picked, secretive group of climate crisis deniers revealed flaws in their methods and โ€œanimusโ€ toward leading scientists.