More dirty-coal plants coming to US despite global warming

authordefault
onFeb 21, 2007 @ 10:46 PST

Power companies plan to build about 150 coal plants over the next few years to meet growing electricity demand, but almost none will be built to control carbon emissions despite expectations climate-change rules areย coming.

Worried environmentalists put their faith in a technology that gasifies coal before burning, while utility officials say gasification is too expensive and unreliable, and their pulverized coal plants can be equipped later to trapย emissions.

But technical experts are dubious of both. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology study, scheduled for release soon, concludes in a draft it isnโ€™t clear which technology โ€” the so-called โ€˜integrated gasification combined cycle or pulverized coal โ€” will allow for the easiest carbon capture, because so much engineering work remains to beย done.

โ€œOther than recommending that new coal combustion units should be built with the highest efficiency that is economically justifiable, we do not believe that a clear preference for one technology or the other can be justified,โ€ the draft concludes. The M.I.T. study said it was critical that government โ€œnot fall into the trap of picking a technology โ€˜winner.โ€™ย โ€

Meanwhile, TXU Corporation of Dallas is planning a fleet of huge new coal plants of the pulverized variety. This week, a Texas District court judge blocked a plan by the governor to โ€œfast trackโ€ TXUโ€™sย application.

In Austin, Tex., Tom Smith, a researcher at Public Citizen, who is helping lead the opposition, said, โ€œItโ€™s clear that coal gasification is by far preferable to building traditional pulverized coal plants.โ€ Getting carbon out of the gas stream before combustion must be easier, Mr. Smith said, because post-combustion gases in a pulverized-coal plant are 160 times asย great.

Some utility executives agree. David Crane, chief executive of NRG Energy, said at some point engineers might work out an economical way to capture carbon after combustion in a pulverized coal plant, but that does not existย now.

Because carbon regulation is coming, he said, gasification plants will be needed. โ€œFor the next generation, itโ€™s clear to me that rather than build a bunch of pulverized coal plants, with their 50-year life, the country is much better off if we go to (gasification),โ€ he said. The company is planning such a plant in Tonawanda, N.Y.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onDec 7, 2025 @ 10:04 PST

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.
onDec 7, 2025 @ 06:01 PST

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.
onDec 4, 2025 @ 11:48 PST

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.
Analysis
onDec 2, 2025 @ 07:48 PST

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.