While models plod, nature sprints

on

It used to be that climate scientists worried about how to make the public care about changes that might not happen for a century. Today they have a bigger problem: some of the changes aren’t waiting around that long.

Stefan Rahmstorf, a climatologist at Potsdam University, points out that models tend to underestimate sea level rise, too. “As climatologists, we’re often under fire because of our pessimistic message, and we’re accused of overestimating the problem,” he says. “But I think the evidence points to the opposite—we may have been underestimating it.”

Related Posts

on
Kathryn Porter, an “independent” energy expert, has become a trustee of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
on
Powerful trade bodies lodged a suite of objections to contribution terms, documents show.
on
Simon Dudley, apparently sacked in April, appeared alongside Richard Tice at Reform’s annual conference.
on
Critics say the firm’s deployment of unproven carbon capture technology risks contributing to a gas-powered AI boom.