Carbon ranching pushes rainforest preservation in global-warming battle

authordefault
on

Carbon ranching allows multinationals to compensate for pollution by paying third-world countries to preserve rainforests. Right now, itโ€™s worth more to a logging company or a peasant to convert to stumps or soybeans than to leave the rainforest intact. With carbon ranching, a hectare of rainforest worth $200-to-$500 for crop production could increase to around $10,000 if preserved as a sponge for carbonย dioxide.

Carbon ranching could also nudge the developing world into the effort to reduce emissions. A coalition of โ€œrainforest nationsโ€ led by Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica has indicated it will participate in carbon ranching without demanding any increase in foreignย aid.

Corporate polluters also like carbon ranching because conserving rainforest is often cheaper than reducing their emissions. Some, like Mitsubishi, are doing it voluntarily to be seen as supporting environmental efforts. They also anticipate that future legislation will let them get credit for it. And business support virtually guarantees the idea will get a hearing in the polluter-friendly White House.

Related Posts

on

Dan McTeague cultivates a media image as a consumer advocate while running a group urging people to fight against climate policies.

Dan McTeague cultivates a media image as a consumer advocate while running a group urging people to fight against climate policies.
on

Industry groups warn of โ€œsupply shocksโ€ as energy shortages grow, but critics say targeting the EUโ€™s methane rule would lock in polluting U.S. fossil-fuel infrastructure at a dire cost to local and global communities.

Industry groups warn of โ€œsupply shocksโ€ as energy shortages grow, but critics say targeting the EUโ€™s methane rule would lock in polluting U.S. fossil-fuel infrastructure at a dire cost to local and global communities.
on

The Tory leader spent a week at the home of a major party donor.

The Tory leader spent a week at the home of a major party donor.
on

After surviving a California wildfire, one family saw premiums quadruple โ€” as states consider laws to force fossil fuel companies to pay for the soaring costs of climate catastrophes they helped create.

After surviving a California wildfire, one family saw premiums quadruple โ€” as states consider laws to force fossil fuel companies to pay for the soaring costs of climate catastrophes they helped create.