U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

on

Sign up for our July 8 virtual conversation on combatting fossil fuels and fascism, keeping up with climate denial, and solving polluted information ecosystems.

Sign up for our July 8 virtual conversation on combatting fossil fuels and fascism, keeping up with climate denial, and solving polluted information ecosystems.
on

More farmed salmon will not necessarily bring better food security, say researchers.

More farmed salmon will not necessarily bring better food security, say researchers.
on

Clare Carlile's reporting was recognized under the โ€˜News Item of the Yearโ€™ award for revealing how UK government staffing shortages would harm the environment during a historic drought.

Clare Carlile's reporting was recognized under the โ€˜News Item of the Yearโ€™ award for revealing how UK government staffing shortages would harm the environment during a historic drought.
on

Companyโ€™s โ€œfaith and philosophy partnershipsโ€ lead sought โ€œmoral voicesโ€ for future AI models at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference.

Companyโ€™s โ€œfaith and philosophy partnershipsโ€ lead sought โ€œmoral voicesโ€ for future AI models at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference.