U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

Opinion
on

Democratic innovation as a pathway for revitalising global climate action.

Democratic innovation as a pathway for revitalising global climate action.
on

The Alberta premier belongs to a U.S. group called the Governors Coalition for Energy Security thatโ€™s led by Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, Trumpโ€™s envoy to Greenland.

The Alberta premier belongs to a U.S. group called the Governors Coalition for Energy Security thatโ€™s led by Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, Trumpโ€™s envoy to Greenland.
Series: MAGA
on

The people behind the reports are tied to the fossil fuel industry and climate science denial groups.

The people behind the reports are tied to the fossil fuel industry and climate science denial groups.
on

Singerโ€™s foundation gave $100,000 to the expertโ€™s think tank, the Hudson Institute, according to 2024 tax records.

Singerโ€™s foundation gave $100,000 to the expertโ€™s think tank, the Hudson Institute, according to 2024 tax records.