U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

on

The Clacton MP has received a platform from a network of MAGA groups that have pushed the presidentโ€™s agenda in the UK and beyond.

The Clacton MP has received a platform from a network of MAGA groups that have pushed the presidentโ€™s agenda in the UK and beyond.
Series: MAGA
on

Trumpโ€™s commerce chief has been promoting the business interests of Farageโ€™s main donor.

Trumpโ€™s commerce chief has been promoting the business interests of Farageโ€™s main donor.
on

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.
on

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.