U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.
on

The Heartland Institute used the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s 2025 annual meeting to spread climate disinformation and tout coal to power AI.

The Heartland Institute used the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s 2025 annual meeting to spread climate disinformation and tout coal to power AI.

Lois Perry, who helps to run Reform Friends of Israel, is one of the figures behind a new Heartland Institute branch in central Europe.

Lois Perry, who helps to run Reform Friends of Israel, is one of the figures behind a new Heartland Institute branch in central Europe.
on

Aspiring influencers share pro-industry climate messaging after attending six-week content creation bootcamp.

Aspiring influencers share pro-industry climate messaging after attending six-week content creation bootcamp.