U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

on

Some lobby organizations that work for environmental organizations also work for the fossil fuel industry.

Some lobby organizations that work for environmental organizations also work for the fossil fuel industry.
on

The Republicโ€™s historic failure to curb agricultural pollution drives concern among campaigners.

The Republicโ€™s historic failure to curb agricultural pollution drives concern among campaigners.
on

Leo-linked operatives were among a who's who of the international right that gathered for the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) conference in June.

Leo-linked operatives were among a who's who of the international right that gathered for the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) conference in June.
on

Farageโ€™s party has accepted more than ยฃ16 million since the last election from those listed in offshore leaks.

Farageโ€™s party has accepted more than ยฃ16 million since the last election from those listed in offshore leaks.