U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

authordefault
on

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K.ย schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock’s request to block the movie’s broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy โ€œbalancingโ€ videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating theย case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read theย judgment?

Related Posts

on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.
on

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.
on

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.
on

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.