Smart Science Policy Not in Canada's "Nature"

authordefault
on

The prestigious science journal Nature condemns the Canadian government in an editorial in its latest edition. The article posts the sorry record of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who has resisted or ignored good scientific advice and has committed Canada to a fossil-fuel economy at a potentially disastrousย time.

Nature is not a partisan magazine; it’s a journal dedicated to science – committed to objectivity and evidence as a matter of course. Yet the editors felt moved to say this: โ€œThe present government might be dissolved after a vote of confidence next month, which could in itself lead to a change for theย better.โ€

Given the similarly sorry record of preceding Canadian governments when dealing with this file, that may be an unreasonably optimistic view. But Nature also calls for an increasingly activist approach by scientists – and it has been courageous here in showing theย way.

Related Posts

on

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.
on

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.
on

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.