The Deniers? The World Renowned Scientist Who Got Al Gore Started

authordefault
on

โ€œMy own personal belief is that we should wait another 10 or 20 years to really be convinced that the greenhouse effect is going to be important for human beings, in both positive and negativeย ways.โ€

Roger Revelle, in a letter to then Congressman Jim Bates, July 14,ย 1988

Among the not-very-credible denials of climate change risk, one of Lawrence Solomon’s most offensive is his attack on the memory and work of Dr. Rogerย Revelle.

Solomon, author of The Deniers: The world-renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution, and fraud (and those who are too fearful to do so) , picks on Revelle entirely because of the credit that climate activist, Nobel laureate and former Vice President Al Gore offers to his old Harvard professor. It was Revelle who told Gore about climate change, spawning the passion that now seems to irritate the denial community soย greatly.

Isn’t it fun, then, for those same deniers to suggest that Revelle didn’t really care about climate change – or that he thought it wasย overblown.

The evidence, as adduced by Solomon in his book and in an earlier column in the National Post, rests on some old quotes and on a 1991 Cosmos article โ€œco-authoredโ€ by S. Fred Singer, Chauncey Starr (of the Electric Power Research Institute) andย Revelle.

I put โ€œco-authoredโ€ in quotes because there is ample evidence that Singer wrote the article entirely himself and then conned an aging Revelle into signing it. Solomon notes that Revelle’s old student, Dr. Justin Lancaster, said as much in 1992, and later retracted the charge, in the face of a lawsuit from the senior and suspiciously well-fundedย Singer.

Solomon also implies that Lancaster only made the accusation against Singer under pressure from Alย Gore.

Well, Justin Lancaster has, as Solomon notes in the book, โ€œretracted his retraction,โ€ the details of which are here. There are arguably two reasons for his change of heart. First, Lancaster is more established now – a personal success who has the resources to stand up to Singer’s bullying. And second, there really isn’t much left of Singer’s reputation toย defend.

But here’s the bottom line: Revelle told Gore about the greenhouse effect and alerted him to the dangers, and Gore has spread that information around more effectively than any other individual on the planet. Revelle, in the last years of his life, also counseled caution in dealing with the issue – which seems to have been a reasonable, if slightly short-sighted position at theย time.

But look again at the quote at the top of this post. Look at the date. Revelle suggested waiting another 10 or 20 years for evidence. Twenty years have passed, during which the world’s scientists have grown more certain and more concerned by theย day.

I don’t know what kind of gotcha game Solomon is trying to play, but proving that Roger Revelle urged caution in 1988, and that he defined caution as adding a $1per-gallon tax on gasoline, doesn’t suggest to me that we should, today, side with the deniers on the issue of globalย warming.

In fact, Solomon should be embarrassed to have invoked the man’sย name.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

While promoting โ€œParis-alignedโ€ green investing, JP Morgan's โ€œgreenโ€ funds have funneled over $4 billion to the fossil-fuel majors, betraying the firmโ€™s promises and undermining efforts to achieve net zero.

While promoting โ€œParis-alignedโ€ green investing, JP Morgan's โ€œgreenโ€ funds have funneled over $4 billion to the fossil-fuel majors, betraying the firmโ€™s promises and undermining efforts to achieve net zero.
on

The Reform leader has barely spoken about his constituency, a deprived area at high risk from the effects of climate change.

The Reform leader has barely spoken about his constituency, a deprived area at high risk from the effects of climate change.
on

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.
on

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.