Enter the Inhofian Polar Bear Expert

authordefault
on

What aย coincidence.

Just as the Alaska State Legislature allocates $2 million for a conference promoting climate change deniers’ โ€œexpertโ€ analysis of why polar bears aren’t really endangered, a poster boy for polar bear junk science emerges from theย woodwork.

Enter J. Scott Armstrong, who is a marketing professor at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. His research emphasizes forecasting methods, which he has used as the cornerstone for – you guessed it – claims that the IPCC climate change projections are actually all wrong.

Now he’s extended his โ€œforecastsโ€ to say that polar bears are doing just fine. He alluded to his research when Sen. James Inhofe called him as an โ€œexpertโ€ to testify before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee regarding the proposed endangered status of the polar bear; now, Armstrong has released an official statement advertising hisย paper.

Here’s the link (warning, slowย website):

Research done by the U.S. Department of the Interior to determine if global warming threatens the polar bear population is so flawed that it cannot be used to justify listing the polar bear as an endangered species, according to a study being published later this year in Interfaces, a journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMSยฎ).

[โ€ฆ]

Professor J. Scott Armstrong of the Wharton School says, โ€œTo list a species that is currently in good health as an endangered species requires valid forecasts that its population would decline to levels that threaten its viability. In fact, the polar bear populations have been increasing rapidly in recent decades due to hunting restrictions. Assuming these restrictions remain, the most appropriate forecast is to assume that the upward trend would continue for a few years, then levelย off.

[โ€ฆ]

Prof. Armstrong and colleagues originally undertook their audit at the request of the State of Alaska. The subsequent study, โ€œPolar Bear Population Forecasts: A Public Policy Forecasting Audit,โ€ is by Prof. Armstrong, Kesten G. Green of Monash University in Australia, and Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It is scheduled to appear in the September/October issue of the INFORMS journal Interfaces.

Armstrong’s claims regarding the increasing polar bear population have been debunked again and again (which doesn’t stop Inhofe and others from repeating the claims, ofย course).

Also, those who are familiar with climate change deniers will recognize Willie Soon ‘s name. He’s one of the true believers that solar activity causes global warming, which has also been repeatedly debunked (quite conclusively , inย fact).

Click here (pdf) to read theย paper.

My forecast is that it will be quoted over and over again throughout theย deniersphere.

As the saying goes, โ€œif you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with..,โ€ well, you know theย saying.

Related Posts

on

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.
on

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.
on

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.
Analysis
on

Backing massive gas-burning data centres is no way to build a cleaner, more connected electricity system.

Backing massive gas-burning data centres is no way to build a cleaner, more connected electricity system.