Tom Harris Pops Up Down Under

authordefault
on

In an article titled the Sad Demise of On-Line Opinion, Australian Clive Hamilton,ย writes:

โ€œThe editors’ appeal to the principles of good journalism to defend the publication of denialist anti-science, but have failed their readers by breaking another tenet of journalistic ethics. The lead author of ‘The UN climate change numbers hoaxโ€, Tom Harris, is described by On Line Opinion at the end of the article as โ€œan Ottawa-based mechanical engineer and Executive Director of the International Climate Scienceย Coalition’.

What readers were not told is that Harris is a paid lobbyist for energy companies, that he has tried to change his Wikipedia entry to conceal the fact that he is or has been employed by the PR company High Park Group, and that at least one other website has pulled his articles because he is a paid politicalย lobbyist.โ€

None of this information is hard to find. See, for example here.โ€

Thanks for the link Clive, you can also find more about Tom Harris and his climate denial resume in our research database.ย 

Related Posts

on

Ofgem has rejected calls for household energy debts to be paid off using excess profits.

Ofgem has rejected calls for household energy debts to be paid off using excess profits.
on

Former fracking magnate Gwyn Morgan has funnelled millions to right-wing media and think tanks, a DeSmog analysis reveals.

Former fracking magnate Gwyn Morgan has funnelled millions to right-wing media and think tanks, a DeSmog analysis reveals.
on

Dan McTeague cultivates a media image as a consumer advocate while running a group urging people to fight against climate policies.

Dan McTeague cultivates a media image as a consumer advocate while running a group urging people to fight against climate policies.
on

Industry groups warn of โ€œsupply shocksโ€ as energy shortages grow, but critics say targeting the EUโ€™s methane rule would lock in polluting U.S. fossil-fuel infrastructure at a dire cost to local and global communities.

Industry groups warn of โ€œsupply shocksโ€ as energy shortages grow, but critics say targeting the EUโ€™s methane rule would lock in polluting U.S. fossil-fuel infrastructure at a dire cost to local and global communities.