DeSmog

Facebook-f X-twitter
Subscribe

DeSmog

Donate
Search
Search

Conservative Case for a Carbon Tax

By Richard Littlemore
on

In a surprising exception (an interesting article in the National Post ), Jonathan Kay makes what he calls a “conservative” argument for a carbon tax.

Reading the piece, there seems no reason to define the Carbon Tax defence in a partisan way. It’s just a good idea.

Kay goes onto then criticize Canadian Liberal leader Stephane Dion proposing – a carbon tax. (Now, THAT‘s partisanship.) While parts of piece are predictable, it is thoughtful, informative and it makes some reasonable criticisms about the weaknesses in Dion’s proposal. All in all worth a read …

By Richard Littlemore

Related Posts

uk/Millions of Dollars Pouring into UK Democracy from Trump’s America
ByMax Colbert and Sam Bright
on
This funding, including significant sums received by MPs, “poses urgent questions for the government”, campaigners say.
Series: Defending-UK-Democracy, MAGA
Revealed: Pro-AI Data Center Group Spending At Least $2.54M on TV Ads to Influence Ohio Election
ByEdward Donnelly and Rei Takver
on
Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Greg Brockman are among the Silicon Valley megadonors reportedly linked to a campaign to influence voters in a state at the heart of the data center boom.
Series: Tech vs Climate
us/Ohio Denies Evidence of Fracking Waste in Drinking Water. Its Own Records Show Otherwise. 
ByJustin Nobel
on
As more than a billion gallons of oil and gas wastewater flood beneath Ohio, pollution concerns reach its heated governor’s race.
Outline of the state of Ohio, filled red, with the locations of Columbus, Coshocton, and Marietta in central, eastern and southeastern parts. The graphic of Ohio has valves and pipes of a fracking wastewater injection well pumping waste into the state. A vintage 1900s era map surrounds Ohio.
President Trump Unveils EPA’s New Contradictory Methane Proposal at Campaign Rally
ByRachel Santarsiero
on
The agency is loosening methane rules while keeping its authority to regulate them. Critics say the stance leaves federal climate law in limbo, inviting a bigger rollback later.