ClimateAudit Endorses 1988 Climate Change Projections

authordefault
on

Next to the much-(and usually falsely)-maligned hockey stick graph, one of the denier community’s favorite targets has been a series of climate modeling graphs that NASA‘s James Hansen produced inย 1988.

Notwithstanding that Hansen has done two more decades of world-leading research, people like Stephen McIntyre of the quibbler site ClimateAudit.Org have obsessed endlessly about the purported โ€œflawsโ€ in that graphย series.

Which is why it’s so surprising to see McIntyre accepting Hansen’s work now.

The thrust of the criticism of this much-dated modeling is that Hansen graphed three potential climate trajectories, two of which appeared to be decidedly above the ACTUAL trajectory of average temperatures mapped during the modelย period.

Certainly, if you click on McIntyre’s most recent post, you see that Hansen’s A and B scenarios are riding high. (Although, you will also notice that the trend lines are tracking in a worrying parallel.) You will further notice that McIntyre has picked the annual low point of a graph that goes up and down EVERY YEAR to try to argue that average temperature is currently below even Hansen’s most modest prediction. That’s a cheap trick, unworthy of a decent statistician.

But then McIntyreย says:

โ€œโ€ฆ the uncertainties in the trend are much wider than sometimes thought and are sufficiently wide that neither Hansenโ€™s Scenario B (nor scenarios with lesser and greater โ€œtrueโ€ increases) can be said to beย rejected.โ€

In English, McIntyre appears to be saying that when temperatures swing as wildly as these ones do, you have to build in a margin of error. And if you accept a reasonable margin of error, you have to accept two of Hansen’s three scenarios as also beingย reasonable.

McIntyre deserves some credit for this acknowledgment. Although he has made himself a tool of the denier community, fixing on statistical errors or controversial interpretations which other people have then used to undermine faith in the whole theory of anthropogenic global warming, he seems in this instance to be valuing his own credibility as a statistician above his alliances to the denierย community.

So, Steve: Bravo! We’ll try to take you more seriously in theย future.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.
on

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.

Green policy is under threat from corporate lobbying, right-wing parties and media and U.S. interference.
on

Partner firmโ€™s pivot to wood-chipping may yet harm forests, campaigners warn.

Partner firmโ€™s pivot to wood-chipping may yet harm forests, campaigners warn.
on

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.