Tar Sands: "Every Canadian has a stake in this"

authordefault
on

On this we can agree: as the mysteriously funded industry apologists say today in the Vancouver Sun, every Canadian has a stake in the Alberta tarย sands.

Certainly, every Canadian is affected by the pollution, the environmental devastation and the international condemnation that the tar sands create. Itโ€™s high time that every Canadian had a voice in deciding whether wholly unfettered development should be allowed – much less promoted – in what is the largest point source for greenhouse gases on the continent, and the fastest growing source inย Canada.

The public relations campaign to give the tar sands carte blanche is being led by a shadowy organization calling itself the Alberta Enterprise Group, which advertises itself as โ€œa common sense public policy advocacy groupโ€ that wonโ€™t admit where it gets itsย funding.

This anonymity is no problem for the provincial government of Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach, who is happy to participate in the AEGโ€™s publicity stunts to draw favorable attention to Canadaโ€™s biggest environmental eyesore. In addition to what the oil industry is already spending through the AEG, Stelmachโ€™s government added a $25-million ad budget last spring to try to prop up the reputation of the tarย sands.

The tar sands is the largest industrial program in Canada. Itโ€™s a 3,000 square kilometre disaster area that generates 1.8 billion litres a day of toxic waste, which is collected into tailing ponds that already cover 50 square kilometres. And regardless of how AEG tries to spin it, the tar sands generate greenhouse gases at three times the rate of conventional oilย generation.

So, yes, every Canadian has a stake. Itโ€™s time that the government of Alberta stopped spending taxpayers money on slick public relations propping up this questionable project and started taking more seriously its responsibility to truly protect the publicย interest.

Related Posts

on

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.
on

Nigel Farageโ€™s donors include Mayfair club owners, fox hunt masters, and the landed gentry.

Nigel Farageโ€™s donors include Mayfair club owners, fox hunt masters, and the landed gentry.
Analysis
on

Little-known company Teton Digital is pushing an AI project that could release one million tonnes of annual emissions.

Little-known company Teton Digital is pushing an AI project that could release one million tonnes of annual emissions.
on

Traditional fishing grounds off-limits as government pursues high-risk gamble on gas, say experts.

Traditional fishing grounds off-limits as government pursues high-risk gamble on gas, say experts.