Obama's science advisor no fan of Bjorn Lomborg

authordefault
on

If the โ€œskepticalโ€ Dane Bjorn Lomborg had any standing with the White House it will quickly evaporate with the incoming Obamaย administration.

President-elect Barack Obama has chosen John P. Holdren as his science advisor – a man who was one of the most vocal critics of Lomborgโ€™s famously inaccurate book The Skeptical Environmentalistโ€.

โ€œThe Skeptical Environmentalistโ€ was so offensive to the scientific community that Scientific American published a ten-page evisceration authoured by four actual researchers, includingย Holdren.

Lomborg tried to refute this critique on his website but apparently knew so little about science that he sent a blanket email to his supporters pleading for help. Itย read:

โ€œNaturally, I plan to write a rebuttal to be put on my web-site. However, I would also love your input to the issues โ€“ maybe you can contest some of the arguments in the Scientific American, alone or together with other academics. Perhaps you have good ideas to counter a specific argument. Perhaps you know of someone else that might be ideal to talk to or get to write aย counter-piece.โ€

Holdren, wryly noted: โ€œIt is instructive that [Lomborg] apparently did not feel he could manage an adequate response by himself. (In this, at least, he was correct. But he could not manage it with help,ย either.)โ€

It looks like Obama has chosen not to take science advice from the likes of Lomborg. Sorry Bjorn. I think your race isย run.

Related Posts

on

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.
Analysis
on

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.
on

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.
on

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.