Putting lipstick on the coal pig

authordefault
on

When people argue that the use of coal and other fossil fuels is still cheaper than renewable energy they usually (and conveniently) fail to mention the external costs of fossil fuels that arenโ€™t factored into the price of burning of these dirtyย fuels.

On the Wall Street Journalโ€™s Environment Capital blog today thereโ€™s a great post explainingย how:

โ€œโ€ฆ fossil fuels remain cheaper because not all their costs are talliedโ€”and that means pollution. Traditional power plants spew particulates into the air as well as carbon dioxide, but historically the cost of that pollution was not included in the pricetag for, say, operating a coal-firedย plant.โ€

Read the entire WSJ post here:ย  AC/DC: Whatโ€™s the True Cost ofย Electricity?


This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Nobel Laureate Dr. Andrew Weaverโ€™s new book Keeping Our Cool: Canada in a Warmingย World.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

Related Posts

Opinion
on

The industry has abandoned its climate pledges in favor of fossil fuel-powered AI data centers.

The industry has abandoned its climate pledges in favor of fossil fuel-powered AI data centers.
on

The Reform leader pocketed major sums from second jobs and donor gifts.

The Reform leader pocketed major sums from second jobs and donor gifts.
on

Some lobby organizations that work for environmental organizations also work for the fossil fuel industry.

Some lobby organizations that work for environmental organizations also work for the fossil fuel industry.
on

The Republicโ€™s historic failure to curb agricultural pollution drives concern among campaigners.

The Republicโ€™s historic failure to curb agricultural pollution drives concern among campaigners.