Putting lipstick on the coal pig

authordefault
on

When people argue that the use of coal and other fossil fuels is still cheaper than renewable energy they usually (and conveniently) fail to mention the external costs of fossil fuels that arenโ€™t factored into the price of burning of these dirtyย fuels.

On the Wall Street Journalโ€™s Environment Capital blog today thereโ€™s a great post explainingย how:

โ€œโ€ฆ fossil fuels remain cheaper because not all their costs are talliedโ€”and that means pollution. Traditional power plants spew particulates into the air as well as carbon dioxide, but historically the cost of that pollution was not included in the pricetag for, say, operating a coal-firedย plant.โ€

Read the entire WSJ post here:ย  AC/DC: Whatโ€™s the True Cost ofย Electricity?


This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Nobel Laureate Dr. Andrew Weaverโ€™s new book Keeping Our Cool: Canada in a Warmingย World.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

Related Posts

on

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.
on

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.
on

Policy update also restricts advertising for fossil fuels products and services in council owned ad sites.

Policy update also restricts advertising for fossil fuels products and services in council owned ad sites.
on

SLICK is a funny yet cutting satire of how the ad industry contributes to the climate crisis.

SLICK is a funny yet cutting satire of how the ad industry contributes to the climate crisis.