Ingraham vs. Gore; Half the Truth Is the Same as a Lie

authordefault
on

During the May 1 edition of The Oโ€™Reilly Factor, talk-radio guest host Laura Ingraham used a well-known Republican tactic to smear Al Gore, former Vice President, climate activist and Nobel Peace Prize winner. Ingraham took only those parts of Goreโ€™s Waxman-Markey testimony that supported her contention and ignored the rest.

Ingraham may consider this balanced reporting, but here in the real world we call this a convenient and highly unscrupulous oversight.

Goreโ€™s testimony, from the April 24 House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing (on the 2009 American Clean Energy and Security Act), clearly stated that โ€œevery pennyโ€ he earned from his climate-change advocacy (i.e., books, movies, and investments in renewable energy) has gone into his nonprofit organization, Alliance for Climate Protection, which aims to persuade Americans to adopt comprehensive solutions to the approaching climate crisis.

By conveniently overlooking that part, Ingraham suggests that Gore has profited wildly from his activisim. Of course, Ingraham โ€“ who is raking it in hand over fist on her โ€œconservativeโ€ (read Republican fear-mongering) talk show, books and appearances โ€“ probably hasnโ€™t come into contact with a real penny for a decade. This, if not so infuriatingly duplicitous, would actually be funny, suggesting as it does that only a select few are allowed to profit from their labors.ย 

Ingrahamโ€™s slant was less surprising than the usual Republican tactics, which frequently involve non sequiturs and Bible-bending (โ€œGod decides when the earth will endโ€), but the viciousness of her attack apparently took even Marc Morano by surprise.

Morano โ€“ whose climate-change denial website Climate Depot purports to โ€œredefineโ€ global warming โ€“ cautiously suggested that Gore was an ideologue, so it wasnโ€™t fair to say he was โ€œdoing it all for the moneyโ€ (this is known as damning with faint praise). Morano was quick to add that global warming is โ€œbig businessโ€ in Washington, with four climate lobbyists for every member of Congress โ€“ a remark that undoubtedly restored him to the right-wing climate denial fold, though probably not without a proverbial rap on the knuckles at some future date.

What Morano failed to note was that the largest sectors in this lobby are manufacturing, power companies, and the oil and gas industry, all of which oppose climate legislation and carbon taxes. In fact, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, or ACCCE (representing 48 mining firms, coal-hauling railroads and coal-fired utilities), was 2008โ€™s biggest lobbyist group, spending $9.95 million, or more than any other organization.

But back to Ingraham, who suggested during the talk show that Gore has used his activism to enrich himself to the tune of about $98 million. Morano hastened to note that Goreโ€™s future earnings from his carbon market operations will, if cap-and-trade passes, make the $98 million look โ€˜pikerlyโ€™ (someone buy that man a Thesaurus; next time try paltry, Morano).

My takeaway from the Oโ€™Reilly episode? The Republican right has backed itself into such an indefensible position on climate change, misrepresentation is the lastย defense.

This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Anthony Barnoskyโ€™s Heatstroke: nature in an age of global warming.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

Related Posts

on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.
on

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.