George Marshall: The Ingenious Ways We Avoid Believing in Climate Change

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
onNov 12, 2010 @ 10:05 PST

George Marshall, founder of the UK-based Climate Outreach Information Network, has a new three-part video series exploring โ€˜The Ingenious Ways We Avoid Believing in Climate Change.โ€™ย  Marshall explores the psychology of climate change denial and climate communications, both in this video series and on his blog ClimateDenial.org. Check out the videos below.
ย 
Part one
Risk โ€“ and why we donโ€™t feel threatened by climate change
Belief โ€“ why we canโ€™t just accept the information and need to believe in it
Attention โ€“ how avoidingย  talking about climate change is like avoiding talking about human rights atrocities



ย 
Part two โ€“
Stories โ€“ the way we mediate information about climate change. The problem with polar bears and why human rights organisations are more interested in ice cream than climate change.



ย 
Part three
Distancing โ€“ the strategies we adopt to keep the information at armโ€™s length
Compartmentalising โ€“ how we can accept climate change and continue polluting behaviour
Positive Framing โ€“ how we seek to turn climate change into a personal advantage
Ethical Offsets โ€“ how we adopt the easiest behaviours as proof of our virtue
Cynicism- the commercial appropriation of climate change images
What happens next? – surprisingly – what happensย next

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

onDec 4, 2025 @ 11:48 PST

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.
Analysis
onDec 2, 2025 @ 07:48 PST

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.

By tying the projectโ€™s fate to Indigenous โ€œequity,โ€ Carney saddles groups with the blame, and potentially the bill, if they move to stop a pipeline they oppose.
onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.