Experts Blame BP For Ignoring Warning Signs That Led To Gulf Disaster

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
on

An independent panel of technical experts released its interim report today, finding that BP and its contractors ignored clear warning signs foretelling the disaster at BPโ€™s Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico.ย  The report, compiled by a scientific committee of the National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, criticized BP for an โ€œinsufficient consideration of riskโ€ in light of โ€œseveral indications of potential hazard.โ€

Convened at the behest of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, the committee was instructed to carry out an independent and science-based investigation into the root causes of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform explosion which killed 11 workers on April 20, 2010.

The experts note that BP and the other companies failed to learn from โ€œnear missesโ€ in the past, and none of the companies or regulators flagged the flawed decisions that contributed to the well blowout.

While the U.S. government continues to allow offshore oil and gas operations following a brief deepwater drilling moratorium, the facts uncovered in independent analyses of the BP blowout point to a systemic industry problem with carelessness and a disregard for safety.ย  It seems cost-shaving and profit potential are the industryโ€™s key concerns, not the safety of Americaโ€™s ecologically sensitive coastal environments, and certainly not the safety of workers and affected communities.

AP reports on the studyโ€™sย findings:

โ€œAmong the hazards highlighted in the panelโ€™s report were several tests that indicated the cement at the bottom of the hole would not be an effective barrier to an influx of oil and gas. More than one month before the disaster, BP also lost drilling materials deep in the hole โ€” a situation that hinted to the challenges of the well but was not used to address risks.โ€

And ENS notes that BP cut corners to save money, according to the newย report:

โ€œCiting testimony given at the Marine Board of Inquiry hearing into the disaster on July 22 by BP Wells Team Leader John Guide, the committee states, โ€œmany of the pivotal choices made for the drilling operation and temporary abandonment of the well were likely to result in less cost and less time relative to other optionsโ€ฆโ€

Reuters has a summary of the reportโ€™s findings, including:

โ€œFailures indicate the lack of a suitable approach for anticipating and managing the inherent risks, uncertainties, and dangers associated with deepwater drilling operations.โ€

The committee will release its final report in Juneย 2011.

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

on

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.
on

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.
on

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.
on

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.