Gas Industry Spent "Staggering" Amount Lobbying in Pennsylvania Last Year

authordefault
on

The gas industry spent $3.5 million last year attempting to convince Pennsylvania lawmakers of the benefits of drilling the stateโ€™s deposits of unconventional gas. According to lobbying disclosure reports filed with the Department of State, the lobbying blitz to influence public policy was orchestrated by a collection of 22 companies, the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) and the Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association (PIOGA).

Rep. Greg Vitali of Havertown described the disclosed amounts as โ€œstaggering,โ€ adding that, โ€œit isnโ€™t the type of spending you would find from fledgling companies.โ€

The Times-Tribune reports the figures as follows:

– Marcellus Shale Coalition: $1.1 million

– Range Resources Appalachia:ย $392,000

– Chesapeake Energy:ย $382,000

– Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association:ย $247,000

– East Resources Management:ย $225,000

– Chief Oil and Gas:ย $186,000

– Alpha Natural Resources:ย $160,000

– Dominion Transmission:ย $146,000

– Exco Resources:ย $130,000

BG North America:ย $124,000

EQT Corp.:ย $105,000

– Talisman Energy:ย $85,000

– Equitable Gas Co.:ย $78,000

– Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania:ย $75,000

– Consol Energy:ย $75,000

CNX Gas Corp.:ย $59,000

– Exxon Mobil:ย $55,000

– Cabot Oil and Gas:ย $50,000

– Pennsylvania General Energy:ย $48,000

XTO Energy:ย $41,000

– National Fuel Gas:ย $36,000

– NiSource:ย $36,000

The dramatic rise of the gas industry in Pennsylvania along with its increasing lobbying presence has put tremendous pressure on state lawmakers, who are charged with both facilitating the drilling boom and protecting the public from the health and environmental threats associated with drilling. Pennsylvania is home to some of the worst unconventional gas production disasters in the country, many stemming from the industryโ€™s use of the controversial hydraulic fracturing (fracking)ย method.ย 

On paper, 2010 was full of promise for those who felt oversight of the gas industry was inadequate. Throughout the year, numerous bills were proposed to tighten accountability of gas drilling activities, ranging from water protection issues, pipeline safety standards and drilling bans in state forests. Both the House and State voiced the need for industry severance taxes and the Department of Environmental Protection introduced more thorough standards regarding drilling pollutants, well construction and frack fluid chemicalย disclosure.

But despite the flurry of legislative proposals, very little was actually accomplished. Only two of the weaker proposed bills were passed into law, one designed to increase access to well production data and the other regarding roll-back taxes for landowners. The proposed severance tax was overshadowed by a less strict impact fee, which was further deferred until thisย fall.

The increasing lobbying activity in Pennsylvania demonstrates the industryโ€™s continued efforts to expand unconventional drilling, despite growing public concern over the inherent risks of dirty fracked gas. The oil and gas industry is focusing its efforts primarily on confusing the public and influencing politicians, not on making their operations safe for public health and the environment.

โ€œThe legislative and regulatory issues facing our industry are countless,โ€ says Marcellus Shale Coalition Vice President David Callahan. โ€œWhile Marcellus development is still in its relative infancy, we recognize that common-sense policies โ€“ at all levels of government โ€“ areย imperative.โ€

Coalition groups like the Marcellus Shale Coalition represent a variety of industry players, from continental drillers and national pipeline operators to multinationals such asย ExxonMobil.ย 

Doubling up on efforts to influence policy, coalition members also exercise their own lobbying muscle. Range Resources, Chesapeake Energy and ExxonMobil each fund a private lobbying arm and, in the case of the latter two, full-scale public relations campaigns designed to influence public opinion regarding the benefits of unconventional gas.ย 

Gas industry lobbying in Pennsylvania has already created some troubling political alliances, like that between Gov. Tom Corbett and former energy executive C. Alan Walker, blurring the lines between public and privateย interests.ย 

At this stage there is little end to the spending spree in sight. Lobbying in the state is set to increase throughout 2011, with the MSC, Range Resources and PIOGA already spending a combined $557,000 between January and March of this year. Shell Oil Co., which only registering to lobby in Pennsylvania on January 3rd, spent $92,000 in the same period.

Image Credit: MarcellusMoney.org

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.