American Petroleum Institute's Jack Gerard Fact Checked By Activists During Speech

authordefault
onJan 22, 2012 @ 18:15 PST

Guest post by Connor Gibson, cross-posted from Polluterwatch.

Two days ago,ย President Obamaย deniedย the permit for the destructive Keystone XLย tar sandsย pipeline, much to the dismay of Big Oil’s top lobbyist and propagandist. Speaking at the National Press Club to an audience dominated by oil, coal and nuclear representatives and lobbyists, American Petroleum Institute (API) presidentย Jack Gerardย continued to lash out at President Obama over the pipeline decision. However, activists attending their eventย fact checkedย Jack’sย big oil talking points.

Shortly after asking the president, โ€œwhat are you thinking?!โ€ย a group of activists stood and delivered a call-and-responseย โ€œfact checkโ€ย over Gerard’s speech โ€“ see the fullย Fact Check video.ย After the event, PolluterWatch’s Connor Gibson approached Jack Gerard on camera and repeatedly asked him how much the American Petroleum Institute (API) is spending on its new โ€œVote 4 Energyโ€ advertising campaign (which, as Mr. Gerard hasย absurdly claimed, is โ€œnot an advertising campaignโ€). Jack refused toย answer:

Vote 4 Energy, whichย was mocked by aย parody commercialย during its public release,ย is the American Petroleum Institute’s newest money dump to pretend that most Americans support politicians who represent Big Oil more than their own constituents.ย Wrapping its talking points inย patriotic rhetoric, API‘s real intent is to continue getting billions of taxpayer dollars each year to corporations like ExxonMobil, Shell and Chevron, which rank among theย most profitable companies in the world.ย 

Vote 4 Energy sets the stage for API to push its key prioritiesโ€“unlimited offshore drilling, including in the Arctic, hydraulic fracturing for gas, pushing the rejected Keystone XL tar sands pipeline,ย and keeping those massive taxpayer subsidies.ย 
ย 
Onย E&E TVย yesterday, Jack Gerard was asked to address theย factย that Keystone XL serves as a tool to export large amounts of Canadian tar sandsย to foreign markets after pumping it across the US. Rather than being able to echo API‘sย dishonest claims of โ€œenergy securityโ€ย through increased access to Canadian oil,ย Gerard was forced to acknowledge that Keystone XL could be used to boost foreign exports.

ย 
Despite a rocky week and an advertising campaignย mocked by theย spoofย Vote 4 Energyย commercial, Jack Gerard will continue working to increase Big Oil’s influence on our election. Numerous API advertisements are airing across the country and API is holdingย โ€œEnergy Forumsโ€ย in key states, peddling their energy lies to American voters.ย What votersย shouldย keep in mind is thatย Big Oil’sย Vote 4 Energyย advertising campaignย isย really about aย Vote 4 Big Oil.

Guest post by Connor Gibson, cross-posted fromย Polluterwatch

authordefault

Related Posts

onDec 8, 2025 @ 04:00 PST

The pro-AI and fossil fuel group tells DeSmog that itโ€™s great to see its ideas โ€œget taken up by government.โ€

The pro-AI and fossil fuel group tells DeSmog that itโ€™s great to see its ideas โ€œget taken up by government.โ€
onDec 7, 2025 @ 10:04 PST

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.

Oil companies are once again asking the high court to intervene in climate deception lawsuits across the U.S. โ€” part of an all-hands-on-deck effort by Big Oil and the Trump administration to shut the cases down.
onDec 7, 2025 @ 06:01 PST

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.

The educational materials distort how fossil fuel pollution has caused the climate emergency, new report finds.
onDec 4, 2025 @ 11:48 PST

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.

U.S. fossil fuel majors led efforts to ensure corporations would not have to introduce climate action plans.