Tar Sands Oil Companies 71 Percent Foreign-Owned – Cue Ezra Levant's Outrage

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
onMay 10, 2012 @ 15:57 PDT

ForestEthics Advocacyย released a game-changing research brief today documenting the massive foreign control of Alberta’s tar sands oil industry. Publicly traded oil companies with active tar sands operations have a very high level of foreign ownership โ€“ 71 per cent.

Some supposedly โ€œCanadianโ€ oil companies including Suncor, Canadian Natural Resources Limited, Imperial Oil and Husky are predominantly owned by foreign interests. More than half of Canadaโ€™s oil and gas revenue goes to companies under foreign control.

This revelation stands in stark contrast to the talking points of the Harper administration and its media echo chamber, which insist that there is too much foreign influence over Canada’s resource decisions from environmental groups. In fact, the evidence shows overwhelmingly that foreign interests are influencing tar sands and other resource decisions – chiefly Chinese and other foreign oil companies.ย 

Cue Ezra Levant’s outrage at this foreign influence in Canadian interests!ย Where’sย Vivian Krauseย when you need her?ย Surely the Ethical Oil Institute will agree that this level of foreign intervention is a dangerous threat to Canada’s future?ย 

Recall that when the Ethical Oil Institute launched its allegedly โ€œ100% Canadianโ€ OurDecision.ca website, this was the statement by spokesperson Kathryn Marshall: ย โ€œWeโ€™ll never take foreign money to undermine our countryโ€™s national interests.โ€ย 

The group admits that it receives funding from companies active in the tar sands. Now that it’s been revealed that all these companies are predominently foreign-owned, the group’s claims to be 100% Canadian are highly misleading. We await their statement correcting the record.

Anticipating that someone, perhaps from the ‘ethical oil’ team, will quickly attempt to do damage control by claiming that this is just some ginned up report by ForestEthics, let’s be crystal clear that the data underlying the report are all from independent sources including Bloomberg Professional and industryย journals.ย 

The ForestEthics Advocacy briefย concludes:

โ€œThe Conservative Harper government is increasingly ruling in favour of foreign-oil companies instead of Canadians. We need foreign investment and shareholders in this country, but it does not need to be at the cost of democracy, our environment, and futureย generations.โ€

Read the full Forest Ethics Advocacy brief [PDF]: Who Benefits? An Investigation of Foreign Investment in The Tar Sands
ย 

Update: Rick Mercer’s takedown of this โ€œforeign-ownedโ€ nationalism talking point is increasingly accurate with every passing day. (H/T AnOilMan).
ย 

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

onNov 11, 2025 @ 06:27 PST

Register to watch on-the-ground coverageย from our team at theย COP30 climate talks in Belรฉm, Brazil.

Register to watch on-the-ground coverageย from our team at theย COP30 climate talks in Belรฉm, Brazil.
onNov 10, 2025 @ 13:42 PST

A summit billed as the last chance to revive global climate action faces unprecedented pressure from the food sectorโ€™s largest emitters.

A summit billed as the last chance to revive global climate action faces unprecedented pressure from the food sectorโ€™s largest emitters.

Organisers offered pesticide giants and agribusiness lobby group โ€œvisibilityโ€ and โ€œimage gainโ€ in return for financial contributions to climate summit's Agrizone.

Organisers offered pesticide giants and agribusiness lobby group โ€œvisibilityโ€ and โ€œimage gainโ€ in return for financial contributions to climate summit's Agrizone.
onNov 10, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

The newspaper has been scolding the BBC for its editorial failings, while issuing a string of climate corrections.

The newspaper has been scolding the BBC for its editorial failings, while issuing a string of climate corrections.