Could Lead Paint Lawsuit Pave Way For Class Action Against Coal Industry?

authordefault
on

Coal industry executives ought to pay attention to the lead paint lawsuit currently happening in the California courtย system.

Recently, a lawsuit was filed against the makers of lead paint, alleging that the industry knew about the toxicity of their product and yet still promoted it as โ€œsafeโ€ to the public.ย  The industry has faced many lawsuits over their products in the past, most of which were unsuccessful for the victims, due to the fact that the industry was often up front about the dangers of their products, and they funded public studies to determine the healthย effects.

But things have changed in the American legal system, and attorneys are now taking a page out of the tobacco litigation playbook.ย  By unearthing documents that detail the lead paint industryโ€™s attempted cover-up of the dangers, they avoid the โ€œbuyer bewareโ€ caveat that the tobacco industry used for soย long.ย 

And just like the tobacco industry, lead paint manufacturers were specifically targeting children with their ads.ย  The California lawsuit is making that a central part of the trial.ย  Also reminiscent of the tobacco litigation, the suit was filed by cities and municipalities, not individual victims, greatly increasing the chance forย success.

The coal industry should be paying very close attention to the progress of this litigation, as their activities could become the next target of skilled attorneys.ย  For decades, the coal industry has been poisoning American citizens with their coal-mining, -burning and -dumping activities.ย  Additionally, the dismal working conditions for miners has cost many families an unnecessary loss ofย life.

The use of tobacco, and even the use of lead paint, were choices that consumers consciously made (in the case of lead paint however, it could have been the only option available.)ย  Both were used by rich and poor alike, covering every socioeconomic facet of the country.ย  The โ€œchoiceโ€ factor actually allowed the industry a break in litigation, by telling juries that consumers made the decision and must live with theย consequences.

The coal industry does not necessarily have the luxury of using the โ€œfree choiceโ€ argument.ย  While the argument could be made that coal miners or residents in areas with coal ash dumps or near power plants could simply move on to a new area or career, economic principles are often not in favor of a career change or relocation.ย  Many residents cannot afford to move away or donโ€™t possess the necessaryย skillsย or are too old to find work in anotherย sector.

Removing the โ€œchoiceโ€ argument certainly makes it easier to try a case, but is there enough evidence on hand to even bring a case?ย  The answer to that question is a little bitย trickier.

Like any class action lawsuit, plaintiffs must be able to prove that the industry not only knew about the dangers of their product, but also were involved in a specific attempt to mislead or deceive the public.ย  The bottom line is that they had to have been 100% aware of the dangers within theirย industry.

Any person with access to the Internet can find a plethora of peer-reviewed scientific studies that extensively detail the dangers of coal burning and coal dumping.ย  Areas around coal plants and dumpsites have abnormally higher rates of cancers, breathing problems, and premature deaths.ย  They also have shorter life expectancies and higher infant mortality rates.ย  Dangerous heavy metals like arsenic and mercury have been proven to be byproducts of the coal burning process, and dumpsites test well above the legal threshold for these toxicย metals.ย 

It would seem that this information would be enough for attorneys to go ahead and file suit.ย  Unfortunately, thatโ€™s not the case.ย  Again, it all comes down to what the industry knew, how long they knew it, and what they did with that information.ย  The studies mentioned above were either done by outside organizations or the federal government, not the industry.ย  While it may be public knowledge, an attorney has to be able to prove that the industry was involved in some form ofย cover-up.

But that may not be as difficult as itย sounds.

Documents have already been uncovered that show that managers at Massey Energy were well aware that the working conditions at Upper Big Branch mine were abysmal, and that it was only a matter of time before something horrible happened to their workers.ย  They hid this information from workers, chose to do nothing about their internal warnings, and in April of 2010, 29 workers were killed in an explosion at the mine.ย  These deaths could have easily been avoided had the company taken appropriateย actions.

There is also plenty of evidence that suggests that the industry was permitted to manipulate EPA studies about the toxicity of coal ash, effectively deceiving the public.ย  Other reports show that the industry outright hid internal reports about the dangers of coal ash.ย  That alone could be enough to spark discovery for a possible suit against theย industry.

What happens in the lead paint lawsuits will likely determine the feasibility of a lawsuit against the coal industry.ย  We’ll be watching closely in the monthsย ahead.ย 

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.
on

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.
on

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€