Fossil Fuels Raising Mercury Levels in Oceans: Study

authordefault
on

An alarming new study has found that human activities mostly associated with burning fossil fuels has resulted in a massive increase in the levels of toxic mercury in the worldโ€™sย oceans.

Published last week in the prestigious international journal Nature, the study,ย A global ocean inventory of anthropogenic mercury based on water column measurements,ย revealed that levels of the environmental poison in marine waters less than 100 metres deep have more than tripled since the Industrialย Revolution.

Using water samples collected during research trips in the Pacific, Atlantic, Southern and Arctic oceans from 2006 until 2011, scientists analyzed mineral mercury levels attributed to fossil fuels, mining and sewage in both shallow and deepย seawater.

While they found that mercury levels in ocean waters less than 100 metres deep had increased by a factor of 3.4 since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, concentrations of mercury throughout the entire ocean had only jumped about 10ย percent.

The scientists were affiliated with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Wright State University, Observatoire Midi-Pyrรฉneรฉs in France, and the Royal Netherlands Institute for Seaย Research.

โ€œWith the increases weโ€™ve seen in the recent past, the next 50 years could very well add the same amount weโ€™ve seen in the past 150,โ€ said Woods Hole marine chemist Carl Lamborg, who led theย study.

โ€œThe trouble is, we donโ€™t know what it all means for fish and marine mammals. It likely means some fish also contain at least three times more mercury than 150 years ago, but it could be more. The key is now we have some solid numbers on which to base continuedย work.โ€

Medical experts have long been warning people โ€” especially pregnant women and small children โ€” to limit or avoid eating some fish like albacore tuna and swordfish because toxic levels of mercury have been found to accumulate in certain species. Numerous studies have shown that mercury can cause reproductive and neurological problems.

According to an accompanying Nature article, the scientists said ocean circulation patterns have helped to blunt the effects of some of the rise in marineย mercury.

โ€œCirculation patterns that drive very cold, salty and dense water to sink into the deep ocean carry large amounts of mercury from shallower depths where life abounds,โ€ the article said.

โ€œThat provides some protection to marine life, as mercuryโ€™s toxic effects magnify with every step up the food chain. For example, the mercury levels in a top predator such as tuna are 10 million times higher than those in the surroundingย seawater.โ€

But Lamborg added that the deep waterโ€™s ability to sequester mercury may soon beย exhausted.

โ€œYouโ€™re starting to overwhelm the ability of deep water formation to hide some of that mercury from us, with the net result that more and more of our emissions will be found in progressively shallower water,โ€ Lamborg was quoted as saying, an event that would increase the odds that mercury levels in key food species will rise, furthering humansโ€™ exposure.

Image credit: Sushi via Shutterstock.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.
on

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.
on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?