Crisis Consultant Says Environmental Activists In It For The Money

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
on

In a newsletter to clients titled โ€œDefending Your Company Against an Activist Attack,โ€ Randal Simonetti from the consulting firm EFP Rotenberg,ย opines that in order to successfully combat an attack by an environmental group you must, โ€œfirst consider the driving motive that supports the attacker’sย existence.โ€ย 

According to Simonetti that driving motivation is money. โ€œFunding is a primary driver of any activist organization’s behaviour,โ€ writesย Simonetti.

To be sure, any non-profit organization must pay some attention to money to keep the lights on and pay decent(ish) wages. But as a former director at the environmental group Greenpeace, I can tell you that activists don’t occupy a logging company’s offices, or lie down in front of a coal train, or march in the streets of New York for money. They do it because they genuinely believe in standing up for their principles and what they believe is right for the human race and theย planet.ย 

To counter these supposed money grubbing activists and their campaigns-for-dollars, Randal Simonetti suggests that companies under attack look to find other companies who โ€œoperate in a similar fashionโ€ and point them out. I know my mom would probably scold Simonetti on this point and ask him, โ€œIf everyone else wants to jump off a bridge, does that mean you have to asย well?โ€

Pointing out that others are just as bad as you, does not excuse your behaviour. Even my 8 year-old knowsย that.

Simonetti ends with this sage advice (insert sarcastic tone and air quotesย here):

โ€œFinally, prepare a cogent defence that indicates you have been aware of the issue for sometime and have been working to positively impact the situation. Communicate your strategy and demonstrate that your attacker is using old news and is out of touch with the reality of theย situation.โ€

I don’t know what to think about this actually. In my experience, if in fact the company is aware of the issueย and has been working to positively impact the situation, they are likely not going to find themselves the subject of an activist campaign. You would be surprised how many companies do not end up the target of an activist campaign because they decided to actually sit down and talk through mutual issues of concern with environmental groups (even withย Greenpeace).ย 

But if Simonetti is suggesting that a company make it up, then that has to be the singular worst piece of crisis communications advice I have ever heard. Making up a story (again, something even my 8-year old knows is a bad idea) might take the heat off at first, but when the company is outed by either the media or the activist group, they will go from being evil, to evilย liars.ย 

What Simonetti forgets in all this, is that maybe the activists are right. Maybe the company is doing bad things that are ruining theย planet.

By assuming from the word go that the company is right and that activists are only in it for the money, Simonetti sets up a path that ends in ruin for both his client and for the environmental advocates who want to see positive change.

It creates a confrontation, instead of dialogue โ€” a log jam before either party has even had the chance to consider the other’s point ofย view.

It sets up a scenario where nobodyย wins.

Which, I guess if you are in the business of crisis communications, is a pretty lucrative situation to find yourself in.ย ย 

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
Kevin is a contributor and strategic adviser to DeSmog. He runs the digital marketing agency Spake Media House. Named a โ€œGreen Heroโ€ by Rolling Stone Magazine and one of the โ€œTop 50 Tweetersโ€ on climate change and environment issues, Kevin has appeared in major news media outlets around the world for his work on digital campaigning. Kevin has been involved in the public policy arena in both the United States and Canada for more than a decade. For five years he was the managing editor of DeSmogBlog.com. In this role, Kevinโ€™s research into the โ€œclimate denial industryโ€ and the right-wing think tank networks was featured in news media articles around the world. He is most well known for his ground-breaking research into David and Charles Kochโ€™s massive financial investments in the Republican and tea partyย networks. Kevin is the first person to be designated a โ€œCertified Expertโ€ on theย political and community organizing platformย NationBuilder. Prior to DeSmog, Kevin worked in various political and government roles. He was Senior Advisor to the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and a Special Assistant to the Minister of State for Asia Pacific, Foreign Affairs for the Government of Canada. Kevin also worked in various roles in the British Columbia provincial government in the Office of the Premier and the Ministry of Health. In 2008 Kevin co-founded a groundbreaking new online election tool called Vote for Environment which was later nominated for a World Summit Award in recognition of the worldโ€™s best e-Content and innovative ICTย applications. Kevin moved to Washington, DC in 2010 where he worked for two years as the Director of Online Strategy for Greenpeace USA and has since returned to his hometown of Vancouver, Canada.

Related Posts

on

The AER significantly underreports the number and scale of spills, says researcher Kevin Timoney.

The AER significantly underreports the number and scale of spills, says researcher Kevin Timoney.
Analysis
on

Poilievre has clearly not earned enough respect from the Trump administration to credibly defend Canadaโ€™s interests.

Poilievre has clearly not earned enough respect from the Trump administration to credibly defend Canadaโ€™s interests.
Analysis
on

New research reveals how Dentsu, Havas, Interpublic Group, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, and WPP cast themselves as climate champions.

New research reveals how Dentsu, Havas, Interpublic Group, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, and WPP cast themselves as climate champions.
on

The groups have filed an OECD complaint against the worldโ€™s largest advertising and PR firm, saying its work enables major polluters to continue harming environmental and human health.

The groups have filed an OECD complaint against the worldโ€™s largest advertising and PR firm, saying its work enables major polluters to continue harming environmental and human health.