That Time When Jim Inhofe Called Climate Change a Hoax

authordefault
on

This DeSmog UK epic history post tells the story of climate denier Jim Inhofeโ€™s infamous โ€˜climate hoaxโ€™ Senateย speech.

The US Senator Jim Inhofe relentlessly denies that humans are driving climate change. In a rambling February speech this year he lobbed a snowball in the Senate as a means of disproving climate change and most recently dismissed President Obama’s warnings that climate change is the greatest threat to future generations as โ€œa severe disconnect fromย realityโ€.

But perhaps one of his best known antics took place in 2003. It was yet another summer of record-breaking heat waves in the United States at the time and the sceptic attack on Michael Mann had reached feverย pitch.

Mann, a climate scientist, described the ordeal of being besieged as the โ€œSerengeti strategyโ€, in which a pride of lions would hunt down the most vulnerable or appetising prey in a stampeding, panickedย herd.

โ€œI have received menacing e-mails, including anonymous death threats. Iโ€™ve received a package containing an Anthrax-like white powder โ€“ the FBI determined that it was a hoax. Someone threw a dead rat on the doorstep of anotherย colleague.โ€ย 

Inhofeโ€™sย Attack

Mann was being hunted because his hockey stick graph had become the iconic image of the global climateย movement.

Senator Jim Inhofe would sound the bugle. The staunch Republican was chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works which had received funding from Koch Industries through their political funds and had supported the Tea Party in the House ofย Representatives.

Inhofe attacked Mann and his hockey stick graph in the Senate on 28 July 2003 during a rambling and exhaustive two-hour rehearsal of the main sceptic claims againstย science.

The section of the speech was called โ€œThe IPCC plays hockeyโ€ and relied on the challenges first set out by Pat Michaels from the Exxon-funded Cato Institute in 1998. But, Inhofe failed to mention this connection to the oilย industry.

Manyย Flaws

Inhofe told his fellow senators that โ€œmany scientists had pointed outโ€ that the graph had โ€œmanyย flawsโ€.

The clearly explained technique of using both modern temperature records and historic tree proxy data on the same graph was characterised by the senator as โ€œa highly controversial and scientifically flawedย approach.โ€

He quoted Michaels directly in stating that comparing the temperature as recorded by thermometers and the temperature as recorded by tree-ring data was โ€œlike comparing apples toย orangesโ€.

His diatribe against Mann concluded with an astonishing claim: โ€œIt’s worth repeating: Mannโ€™s theory of global warming is out of step with most scientific thinking on the subject,โ€ heย huffed.

Show-Stoppingย Speech

The speech was a show stopper fit for Broadway, and is still perhaps unrivalled in the climate debate for its elegance, gall andย surrealism.

โ€œLet me be clear,โ€ he thundered, โ€œalarmists are attempting to enact an agenda of energy suppression that is inconsistent with American values of freedom, prosperity, and environmental progress. Over the past two hours I have offered compelling evidence that catastrophic global warming is a hoax. That conclusion is supported by the painstaking work of the nationโ€™s top climateย scientists.โ€

He said his scientists had shown that climate change was just natural variability, that there had been โ€œno meaningful warmingโ€, and that climate models were highlyย imperfect.

He then named these scientists as Dr S. Fred Singer, Dr Richard Lindzen, and Dr David Wojick, shrewdly entangling their credentials with the names of respected climate researchers to give his speech furtherย gravitas.

Call toย Arms

The speech was a call to arms and the climate deniers in the US and the UK would be galvanised by its power and sheerย imaginativeness.

He puffed: โ€œWith all of the hysteria, all of the fear, all of the phony science, could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people? It sure sounds likeย it!โ€

Mann himself expressed an appreciation for the tragicomic theatricality of Inhofeโ€™sย speech.

โ€œPersonally, I thought Mr Inhofe was paying my colleagues and me a tremendous compliment,โ€ Mann wrote in his account of the climateย wars.

โ€œAfter all, if thousands of highly opinionated and frequently cantankerous climate scientists had indeed conspired not only to coordinate such an elaborate hoax, but to get the ice sheets, sea level, and ocean temperatures to play along, we were certainly far more impressive a bunch than anyone had everย acknowledged.โ€

Whatever Mann is implying, Inhofe is no fool.ย  According to the Center for Responsive Politics, in the five years leading up to 2006 he received $40,000 from Koch Industries, both directly and indirectly, a total of $452,108 from the oil and gas industry, $384,643 from electric utilities and then a further $245,724 fromย lobbyists.

Up next in the DeSmog UK epic history series, we look at Julian Morrisโ€™s ExxonMobil-funded climate sceptic publication: Adapt orย Die.

@Brendanmontague

Photo: Gage Skidmore viaย Flickr

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.