Climate Professor Peter Wadhams Says He Does Not Think Colleagues Were Murdered

authordefault
on

Does UK climate scientist and sea ice researcher Professor Peter Wadhams think three of his peers wereย assassinated?

If youโ€™ve read the story as it quickly spread across the conservative media in recent days, then your answer to this question would be a resoundingย โ€œyesโ€.

But DeSmog asked Wadhams last night if he believed the deaths of scientists Seymour Laxon, Katherine Giles and Tim Boyd were anything other than tragicย accidents.

Wadhams told us: โ€œNo, they were clearlyย accidents.โ€

As reported in The Guardian, Wadhams has complained to the UK press watchdog the Independent Press Standards Organisation about the original story in The Times, written by Environment Editor Benย Webster.ย 

Websterโ€™s story, carrying the headline Climate scientist fears murder by hitman, quoted Wadhams as saying the deaths were โ€œtoo bizarre to beย accidentalโ€.

In the story, Professor Wadhams, an expert in ocean physics at the University of Cambridge, is also said to have questioned if his own near miss with a lorry might also be linked to the deaths of hisย colleagues.

Professor Seymour Laxon died in January 2013 after falling down stairs at a New Year’s Eve party in the UK.

Dr Katherine Giles, a colleague of Laxonโ€™s, was killed a few months later while riding her bicycle to work at University Collegeย London.

Dr Tim Boyd also died in January 2013 while walking near his home in Scotland after apparently being struck byย lightning.

But in his complaint to IPSO, which Wadhams shared with DeSmog, he states that he had told Webster that โ€œfor a short timeโ€ he had thought the three may have been killed, but that it was โ€œvery clearโ€ that after all three were investigated they were indeedย accidents.

In the complaint, Wadhams says that he had requested to Webster that the conversation about the deaths be โ€œcompletely off the recordโ€ because he โ€œdid not want to be made out to be a crazy personโ€. He says he โ€œdid not make any of the statements enclosed in quotation marks by theย reporterโ€.

Wadhams also told DeSmog that he believed the story in The Times was โ€œpart of a concerted campaign against climate change awarenessโ€ by the Murdochย press.

The Times has defended the story, telling The Guardian that it stands by the story and that it has a recording of Wadhams making the publishedย statements.ย 

Wadhams told DeSmog that if such a recording exists, it would illustrate that โ€œWebster said that confidentiality would be respected, that this was off the record, and that he would contact me if he wanted to do anything withย it.โ€

Another major UK newspaper, The Daily Telegraph, quickly followed up the story, apparently with new quotes fromย Wadhams.ย 

Wadhams has told DeSmog that he did take a call from The Daily Telegraph, but โ€œI didnโ€™t tell themย anythingโ€.ย 

After seeking clarification, Wadhams told DeSmog that the Daily Telegraph story was โ€œinnacurate and quoted me wronglyโ€ but did not provide details, saying he was โ€œweary of the continuing harassment from which I have been sufferingโ€ and no longer wanted to communicate โ€œwith any kind ofย journalistโ€.

DeSmog is attempting to contact the Daily Telegraph forย clarification.

In 2012, Wadhams predicted that the Arctic would โ€œprobablyโ€ be ice-free during the months of August and September by 2015 orย 2016.

Webster had initially contacted Wadhams for comment on a scientific paper published in Nature Geoscience that had recorded an increase in the volume of ice in the Arctic between 2009 and 2013, something the authors have said is likely temporary as the region continues to warm.

Clearly Webster decided Wadhamsโ€™ apparently off-the-record comments about his initial thoughts about three tragic deaths two years ago were moreย newsworthy.

Since The Times story appeared, outlets across the world have repeated the central claim that Wadhams believes his colleagues wereย murdered.

Conservative outlets Breitbart and The Daily Caller and Australia-based News Corporation blogger and climate science denialist Andrew Bolt have all used the story to ridiculeย Wadhams.

Other newspapers, including The Independent (UK), the Daily Mail (UK) ,ย The Age (Australia), Sydney Morning Herald (Australia) and The Dominion Post (New Zealand) all published versions of the original stories either from The Times or The Dailyย Telegraph.

Many of the stories were published before The Guardian made public Wadhams’ complaint to IPSO but none appear to have checked with the scientist beforeย publishing.

Below is the complaint in full which Wadhams told DeSmog he had sent to IPSO.

The writer of this article, Ben Webster, phoned me up cold in my office at Cambridge University on Thursday 23 July, saying that he was writing a piece on the retreat of sea ice in the Arctic, and whether it was increasing or not. We discussed the scientific data, then he asked who else was working in this field in the UK, in order to contact them. I mentioned that there are not many others in this field, since three of the leading figures died within a short space of time in accidents in 2013. He asked for further details. I asked that this be completely off the record because of (a) the sensibilities of relatives of the deceased (Prof Laxonโ€™s partner was particularly upset by the subsequent publication), (b) my own scientific reputation (I did not want to be made out to be a crazy person), (c) the fact that these deaths were investigated and were very clearly simply an extraordinary coincidence. He raised the question of whether they were murdered. I agreed that for a short time I thought that they were, since I had had the experience of being run off the road at the same time by a lorry, but that it was very clear afterwards that the three deaths were individually explainable accidents. I did not make any of the statements enclosed in quotation marks by the reporter. Webster promised that this was in confidence and that if he wanted to use it he would contact me first. The next thing I saw was the article plastered over Saturdayโ€™s โ€œTimesโ€. He had clearly done some research in procuring photographs, but did not bother to contact me, and broke his promise of confidentiality. The publication, subsequently picked up by the Sunday Telegraph and Mail on Sunday, has substantially damaged my reputation for scientific integrity, and I believe that this was the deliberate intention, since the Murdoch organization is known to be fanatically opposed to climate change and to have sunk on many previous occasions to low tactics in attempts to discredit climate changeย researchers.

Peter Wadhams ScD Professor of Ocean Physics University ofย Cambridge

Related Posts

on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.
on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.