Are Oil Giants Backing a Climate Solution That Will Never Happen?

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

Oil and gas giants are betting the shop on a carbon price being implemented in order to tackle climate change. But experts speaking at todayโ€™s Economist Energy Summit in London agreed that an effective global carbon price just isnโ€™t going to happen.

Last month ten major fossil fuel companies, including Shell, Total, BP, and Statoil, announced a joint climate declaration recognising the need to limit the global average temperature rise to 2C. In order to achieve this, a โ€œwidespread and effective pricing of carbon emissionsโ€ is needed alongside more gas and renewables, they argued.

But as Henry Tricks, energy and commodities editor at the Economist, put to executives at BP, Statoil and Total: โ€œYouโ€™re all basing a lot of your future scenarios on the idea that there will be a carbon price. Youโ€™re calling for it, and yet most people donโ€™t agree that itโ€™s going to happen on a global scale. What is needed for it to happen?โ€

Paris Climate Conference

This question comes after the United Nationsโ€™ climate chief Christiana Figueres told an investor event that a carbon price will not come out of Paris โ€“ this being the main ask of oil and gas giants in the run up to the climate conference.

Nick Butler, visiting professor at Kingโ€™s College London, told the Economist event that a carbon price wonโ€™t come out of the Paris climate conference.

โ€œI think that real change will only come when either we have a global carbon price at a level which really changes behaviour, which is probably $50-60 a tonne,โ€ said Butler.

โ€œOr a scientific breakthrough which produces a new form of energy, maybe solar plus storage, which is low-cost and low-carbon, and which changes the market. And I hope we get there and itโ€™s a great possibility but weโ€™re not there yet. At the moment there is still a lot of business to be done in the conventional energy sector.โ€

Paul Stevens, a distinguished fellow in energy, environment and resources from Chatham House, added: โ€œThe only way weโ€™re going to get a real, effective carbon price is through taxation.โ€

Political Will

So aside from calling for a global carbon price, how exactly are oil and gas companies expecting this to become a reality?

Turns out that, according to the oil majors on the panel, itโ€™s up to governments and society to drive this home. If they are successful in bringing in a carbon price, then the oil and gas companies will respond.

โ€œIf there is a price of carbon, our industry will adjust to meet them accordingly,โ€ explained Philippe Boisseau, president of marketing, services and new energies at Total. โ€œSo what weโ€™re saying is that if we just leave the forces of the market in the existing landscape without changing anything we wonโ€™t be able to adjust, just because we live in an economic environment that we need to operate in.โ€

He continued: โ€œIf there is a price of carbon we will adjust to this price, thatโ€™s what weโ€™ve said. We can make efforts and we are making efforts but they are not enough. We need more if we want to deal with the two-degrees target, this is the meaning of the statement that was made.โ€

Dev Sanyal, executive vice president of strategy and regions at BP, added: โ€œUltimately societies have to determine what will happen, and governments are a reflection of society.

โ€œUltimately we work within a framework set by government,โ€ Sanyal said, emphasising that there are other actors who must also play a role.

โ€œItโ€™s political will. What weโ€™re saying down the panel, Iโ€™m afraid, is we need political will,โ€ added Ian Taylor, president and chief executive at Vitol, global commodity trading company.

In the meantime, gas, gas, and more gas, was emphasised by everyone on the panel. And while they all recognised the challenge of meeting a 2C target, no substantial solutions other than a carbon price were put forward.

But as Tricks countered, who else is better placed than the oil industry to push governments on a carbon price?

โ€œThe oil industry has a very strong lobby, it could put, it could have put, a lot more effort into lobbying for this change,โ€ he said. โ€œSomeoneโ€™s got to be the driver on it.โ€

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.

European fertiliser giant has launched a local โ€˜charm offensiveโ€™ to gain support for its chemical factory plan.
on

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€
Series: MAGA
on

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.
on

The agencyโ€™s work for the fossil fuel industry has made it โ€œcomplicit in causing existential harm to people and planetโ€, say campaigners, who are calling on WPP to drop those clients.

The agencyโ€™s work for the fossil fuel industry has made it โ€œcomplicit in causing existential harm to people and planetโ€, say campaigners, who are calling on WPP to drop those clients.