Big energy and fossil fuel companies are enjoying privileged access to the EUโs top climate policy decision makers in the run-up to Decemberโs Paris climate conference a new reportย reveals.
The report by transparency research and campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) looks at all meetings held by Commissioners Miguel Arias Caรฑete and Maros ล efฤoviฤ during their first year in office. In total, energy companies make up 30 per cent of all lobby encounters with the commissioners and theirย cabinets.
When it comes to discussing climate and energy policy, three-quarters of the European Commissionโs encounters with the energy industry were with fossil fuel companies including BP, Statoil, andย Shell.
Renewables vs Fossilย Fuels
At the same time, specialist renewable energy companies have not enjoyed a single one-to-one meeting with the Commissioners. Meanwhile, only six renewable energy associations hadย meeting.
In fact, for every meeting with the renewables sector, Caรฑete โ a former director of two oil companies now responsible for energy and climate action โ had 22 meetings with the fossil fuel industry. ล efฤoviฤ, who is in charge of the Energy Union, had just one meeting with renewables compared to 29 with the fossil fuelย industry.
Graphs via CEO report
CEO researcher and campaigner Belรฉn Balanyรก said: โThis data is extremely worrying given the sensitive topics these Commissioners have been in charge of over the past year. Industry-friendly policies on car emissions, Energy Union, the Emissions Trading Scheme, and the upcoming COP21 UN climate negotiations clearly reflect the disturbing level of access to decision-makers enjoyed by dirtyย energy.
โWhile the science says we must urgently and drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions, boost renewables, and dramatically increase energy efficiency, the Commission is sadly moving in the oppositeย direction.โ
BP and E.ON
Oil giant BP and electricity company E.ON are deemed two of the most powerful lobbyists in Brussels according to the report. In 2014, BP spent between โฌ2,750,000 and โฌ2,999,999 (ยฃ1,959,362 and ยฃ2,137,485) lobbying the European Commission. Meanwhile, E.ON spent between โฌ2,000,000 and โฌ2,249,999 (ยฃ1,424,990 and ยฃ1,603,114). Both are also members of numerous trade associations that lobby against climateย action.
With 15 encounters each, BP and E.ON had the most contact with the Commission out of all the fossil fuel companies. This was followed closely by 14 meetings with Statoil and 12 with each of Shell, Engie and Iberdrola each. Other companies that met with the Commission include RWE, EDF andย Eni.
โThis privileged access is reflected in the Commissionโs policies, from the direction of the Energy Union as it locks in fossil fuel infrastructure, to the watering down of the EUโs climate ambitions,โ argues theย report.
Civilย Society
The report also reveals how neither Caรฑete nor ล efฤoviฤ are anywhere near meeting Commission President Juncker’s promise for โbalance and representativenessโ in the stakeholders that Commissionersย meet.
Indeed, on top of securing far fewer encounters with top officials, civil society groups such as NGOs and trade unions were met far more often in larger groups than business groups, who enjoyed more one-to-one contact with the Commission’s highest levelย officials.
โIn fact, they should be reconsidering whether it is appropriate at all to meet with the most polluting companies to discuss climate and energy policies. Those causing the problem should not be deciding how we fix itโ, addedย Balanyรก.
Photo: TPCOM viaย Flickr
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts