George Bush Sr Cabinet Was Worried About Climate Change 27 Years Ago

authordefault
on

The agreement that was hammered out in Paris at the recent climate talks will be a great step forward towards addressing the growing threat of climate change. But lost amongst the applause for the accord is a question that needs to be answered: Why did it take so long, and are we tooย late?

Two weeks ago, memos from the George H.W. Bush administration were released that detailed conversations between Bush Sr.โ€™s cabinet members, where they discussed the growing threat of global climate changeโ€ฆ27 yearsย ago.

The Hill has posted parts of thoseย conversations:

โ€œGlobal climate change is the most far reaching environmental issue of our time,โ€ a 1989 memo from Acting Assistant Secretary of State Richard J. Smith said. โ€œIf the climate change within the range of current predictions actually occurs, the consequences for every nation and every aspect of human activity will beย profound.โ€

Writing to Secretary of State James Baker, Smith said, โ€œAs you yourself stated we cannot wait until all the uncertainties have been resolved before we act to limit greenhouse gas emissions and to prepare for whatever climate change we are already committedย to.โ€

Those conversations took place over 27 years ago, and in the present day, leaders in the United States are still having debates about climate change. And not just about how to act, but weโ€™ve regressed to the point that we are still debating whether or not the problem even exists.

But Bush Sr. was not the first Republican president to understanding the growing threat of climate change. The newly released memos also tell us that the problem was discussed among Ronald Reaganโ€™s cabinetย members.

These two Republicans were then followed by Democrat Bill Clinton (whose vice President, Al Gore, has been one of the leaders in the United States pushing for action on climate change), then by Republican George W. Bush, and finally by Democrat Barackย Obama.

And it wasnโ€™t until the summer of 2015 โ€” more than 30 years after the first U.S. presidents were warned about the dangers of growing emissions โ€” that we got our first real set of rules to reduce our carbon emissions in a meaningfulย way.

So why did it take so long when both Reagan and Bush Sr. were advised of theย threats?

The memos shed some light on the fact that both men, and their respective advisors, were actually trying to accomplish something with regards to climate changeย action:

In connection with the Montreal Protocol (negotiated in 1987 and put into effect in 1989), both Reagan and Bush 41 showed a clear desire to tackle environmental concerns and to lead the global community in that effort, according to the documents. Protests by the Domestic Policy Council, led by Attorney General Edwin Meese, and other agency heads led Reagan to step in to ensure adoption of the final set of U.S. objectives for the treaty. Bush basically shared his predecessorโ€™s views on entering office in Januaryย 1989.

Both presidentsโ€™ secretaries of state, George P. Shultz and James A. Baker III, played key roles in blocking efforts by other Cabinet secretaries to frustrate implementation of more environmentally friendly policies. For example, memos for senior State Department officials in todayโ€™s posting note that โ€œGlobal climate change is the most far reaching environmental issue of our timeโ€ and that notwithstanding the need for continued research, โ€œWe simply cannot wait โ€“ the costs of inaction will be tooย high.โ€

Republicans have rightfully taken a lot of heat for their refusal to accept the science behind climate change, but clearly this wasnโ€™t always theย case.

Unfortunately, this new information only raises more questions than it answers. For example, Bush Sr. built on the success of Reaganโ€™s Montreal accord, so why did Bill Clinton drop theย ball?

George W. Bushโ€™s father believed in climate change, so why did he refuse to acknowledge the threat until his last few years in office, and then he still refused to act? (He also pulled us out of the Kyotoย Protocol.)

And most importantly, why did Barack Obama โ€” the first president to address climate change in both campaigns and since taking office โ€” take seven years to give us an emissions reductionย rule?

We can blame obstruction from deniers or the influence of fossil fuel money all day long, and they do deserve a large share of the blame. But the politicians are not the main problem. The real problem lies with American voters. They are the ones who put science deniers in office, and they are the ones who are not demandingย action.

Voters hold all of the power in the United States, and until they realize this, we will continue to get watered down safety standards that pay lip service to the problem while the planet continues toย burn.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

Carrboro, N.C., accuses Duke of knowingly fueling the climate crisis for decades with harmful emissions, deception, delay, and "greenwashing."

Carrboro, N.C., accuses Duke of knowingly fueling the climate crisis for decades with harmful emissions, deception, delay, and "greenwashing."
on

Campaigners warn that the UK will face โ€œpressure from American fossil fuel interestsโ€ to slow its energy transition.

Campaigners warn that the UK will face โ€œpressure from American fossil fuel interestsโ€ to slow its energy transition.
Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.
on

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.