While Lobbying Against Safety Regulations, Exxon Admits to Potential for Stranded Assets

mikulka color
on

After learning that Exxon misled the world about its advanced understanding of climate change science for decades, it shouldnโ€™t be too surprising to learn that the company is being less than truthful about what the reality of climate change means to its oil-based business model now.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement to meet or beat a two degree Celsius limit on global warming, the science is clear that to achieve this goal, a lot of known fossil fuel reserves will have to remain in the ground. From the industry’s perspective, that will mean โ€œstrandedโ€ย assets.

And while groups like Ceres have made progress to get oil and gas companies to acknowledge this reality via investor led efforts, Exxon has adamantly claimed that none of its assets will beย stranded.

Exxon makes this position clear on its corporateย website:

โ€œwe are confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will becomeย โ€œstranded.โ€

However, what a corporation says in public โ€” and what it says in private meetings when arguing against new safety regulations โ€” is typically veryย different.

In response to the BP Horizon oil disaster, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement is preparing new regulations to prevent accidents like that in the future. And, of course, Republicans in Congress are arguing against such regulations in publicย discussions.

Exxon and other oil companies are meeting in private with regulators to do the same. On March 7th members of Exxon met with regulators at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to discuss the regulations titled โ€œBlowout Prevention Systems and Wellย Control.โ€

In a seven page presentation arguing against this regulation, Exxon made the admission that this additional safety requirements would be costly โ€” and would result in some of its assets becoming stranded.


ย 

So while Exxon has publically stated that none of its assets will ever be stranded due to policies required to achieve a two degree scenario, in private they admit something as minor as a new safety regulation would leave assets stranded.

History has shown that the oil industry โ€” with the help of its operatives in Congress โ€” has a great track record of weakening safety regulations. This time will likely be no different.

However, we also now know that 17 attorneys general are โ€œexploring working together on key climate change-related initiatives, such as ongoing and potential investigations into whether fossil fuel companies misled investors and the public on the impact of climate change on their businesses.โ€

Regardless of the outcome of this regulation it is clear that even Exxon is internally acknowledging that forces outside of its control could result in assets becoming stranded โ€” which contradicts the statement on its corporate website.

Seems like the attorneys general might be onto something.ย 

Blog Image: Curveย Digital

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

His push for more gas development alarms climate change experts amid growing evidence of declining global LNG demand.

His push for more gas development alarms climate change experts amid growing evidence of declining global LNG demand.
on

A pro-Trump, pro-oil oligarchy is being convened by a group backed by the owners of GB News, campaigners say.

A pro-Trump, pro-oil oligarchy is being convened by a group backed by the owners of GB News, campaigners say.
on

Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta reportedly drafted the memo that took aim at the โ€œgreen new dealโ€ but caused widespread upheaval.

Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta reportedly drafted the memo that took aim at the โ€œgreen new dealโ€ but caused widespread upheaval.
Analysis
on

Understanding how autocrats and oligarchs capture and consolidate state power.

Understanding how autocrats and oligarchs capture and consolidate state power.