Brexit Could Harm UK and EU’s Climate Ambition — Report

Brexit Could Harm UK and EU’s Climate Ambition — Report
on

Whatever deal Brexit secretary David Davis manages to strike with the EU, it could have a negative significant impact on climate policy both on the continent and in the UK, a new report has warned.

Dublin-based think tank the Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA) looked at four different Brexit scenarios, and found that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU would likely harm the region’s overall ambition to climate change.

In one scenario — an ultra-hard Brexit, where the UK uses its withdrawal as an excuse to roll back EU regulations to protect the environment — the country’s climate policy could be “radically altered” with the landmark Paris Agreement “threatened”, the report said.

In the most likely scenarios, a soft or hard Brexit, the EU’s overall ambition to cut emissions is more hurt by the UK’s withdrawal.

That’s because the UK is one of the union’s more successful countries at cutting emissions. So when it leaves, other countries are likely to have to increase their efforts if the EU is going to hit its Paris Agreement goal of a 40 percent emissions reduction by 2030.

In a ‘soft’ Brexit scenario, the UK would likely remain part of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS), as other non-member countries such as Iceland and Norway are. That would reduce the impact of Brexit on the EU’s emission reduction ambitions to an extent, and ensure the UK kept its current level of ambition for reducing industrial emissions.

In a hard Brexit, the UK would likely leave the EU ETS but may establish a parallel scheme, mitigating the impact on both the region and country’s climate goals, the report claimed.

Only in an ultra-hard Brexit scenario is the UK’s climate ambition significantly affected, it said. In that case, the UK could leave the EU ETS and seek to “gain competitive advantage over its trading partners through the continued exploitation of ‘cheap fossil fuels’”, the report said.

Under an ultra-hard Brexit deal, the UK could also use Brexit as an excuse to get rid of EU regulations on vehicles and energy efficiency — a scenario that campaigners and experts have been warning politicians about for months.

The UK could even decide to withdraw from the Paris Agreement process, as President Trump recently did, and possibly seek to revise or scrap the UK’s climate change act, the report claimed.

While that scenario is less likely, the report said it “cannot be entirely discounted” as it is promoted by “a vocal cohort within the Conservative Party, as well as elements of the UK press, and reflected in the establishment of groups such as the Red Tape Initiative”.

The Red Tape Initiative was looking at repealing or amending fire regulations shortly before the Grenfell Tower disaster, EnergyDesk recently revealed.

Green party co-leader Caroline Lucas recently tried to introduce an amendment to the Queen’s Speech to push the government to pass an environmental protection bill. Such a law would ensure the “transfer all relevant EU law into domestic law by way of primary legislation”.

Report author Joseph Curtin told the Irish Times: “One thing is clear: further to the damaging withdrawal of the US from the Paris Climate Agreement, the last thing global efforts to tackle climate change need is Brexit; and the harder the Brexit, the worse the climate impact”.

Depending on which scenario plays out, changes to the EU pledge could be required, climate finance flows could be affected and the UK role in climate leadership could be diminished,” the report concluded.

Main image credit: ilovetheEU via Wikimedia Commons CC BYSA 4.0

Get Weekly News Updates

Brexit Could Harm UK and EU’s Climate Ambition — Report
Mat is Special Projects and Investigations Editor of DeSmog, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UK’s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

on

The project will result in an estimated 34 million tons of extra CO2 per year, topping the annual emissions of Uganda and Tanzania combined.

The project will result in an estimated 34 million tons of extra CO2 per year, topping the annual emissions of Uganda and Tanzania combined.
on

The petroleum company is under investigation for misleading the public while exacerbating the global plastic pollution crisis.

The petroleum company is under investigation for misleading the public while exacerbating the global plastic pollution crisis.
Analysis
on

Industries make green claims while lobbying against climate targets and promoting high-carbon travel.

Industries make green claims while lobbying against climate targets and promoting high-carbon travel.
on

CalPERS and CalSTRS, which oppose fossil fuel divestment legislation, have “wildly exaggerated” divestment costs, according to Fossil Free California’s latest report.

CalPERS and CalSTRS, which oppose fossil fuel divestment legislation, have “wildly exaggerated” divestment costs, according to Fossil Free California’s latest report.