Children File Suit Against Trump Administration for Ignoring Climate Dangers

authordefault
on

This week the federal government is once again being sued for its decision to ignore the growing threat of climate change. And, just like an earlierย lawsuit on this issue, it is being brought by the group that stands to suffer the most from climate inaction:ย Children.

Two Pennsylvania youthย are taking on the Trump administration for what they are calling a โ€œreckless and deliberate indifferenceโ€ to the issue of climate change. The environmental organizationย Clean Air Council is bringing the suit on behalf of the children in thisย case.

Common Dreams explains the grievances brought in theย suit:

โ€œAmong the actions cited in the suit are ditching the Paris climate accord, stopping methane emissions reporting by oil and gas companies, approving the Keystone XL pipeline, proposing cuts to federal agencies dealing with climate change, proposing the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, and purging scientists from the EPA board of scientificย counselors.โ€

The lawsuit claims that these specific actions are going to create an avoidable problem for the future generation (in this case, the specific children bringing the lawsuit), and therefore infringe upon the Fifth and Ninth Amendment rights of theย plaintiffs.

The defendants listed in the suit include President Donald Trump, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt, as well as the EPA and Department ofย Energy.

Much like the pendingย lawsuit that was filed against state and federal government leaders by Our Childrenโ€™s Trust a few years ago, this latest suit is incredibly ambitious and has the potential to reshape climate policy in the United States, if it proves to beย successful.

So far, the lawsuit brought by Our Childrenโ€™s Trust has won a few victories on the path to a full-blown trial.ย The most recent was a ruling by a judge that said that the plaintiffs in the case make a sound, reasonable argument and therefore the case was allowed to move forward. The trial for that case is set to begin in February of 2018.

Both of these legal cases will hinge on whether or not the plaintiffs are expected to endure tangible damages as a result of the actions or inaction of the government. So far, the arguments that have been made in the courtroom have given judges enough evidence to suggest that the damages are real, which is why these cases have been allowed toย continue.

A victory in either of these cases has the potential to force the federal government to begin taking serious action on the issue of climate change.ย In addition, the suits could helpย reverse the purge of scientistsย that is currently taking place at the EPA, in which experiencedย scientific advisorsย are being removed by the dozen from EPA advisory committees and replaced with members representing the fossil fuel and chemicalย industries.

Main image: Activedia viaย Pixabay

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.