Minnesota Approves Controversial Enbridge Pipeline Rebuild

authordefault
on

Byย Olivia Rosane, EcoWatch. Reposted with permission from EcoWatch.

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approved a controversial rebuild of Line 3 of theย Enbridge Energyย oilย pipelineย Thursday, as environmental activists and Native American groups vowed to keep fighting,ย The Associated Press reported.

Opponents are concerned about the need for newย fossil fuelย infrastructure and the danger of anย oil spillย near vulnerable ecosystems in Minnesota, including areas where Native Americans harvest wild rice, which is sacred to theย Ojibwe.

โ€œYou have just declared war on the Ojibwe!โ€ Tania Aubid of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe stood and said when the PUC‘s decision becameย apparent.

โ€œWhat they have done to us today is egregious,โ€ย Honor the Earthย executive director Winona LaDuke toldย Reuters. โ€œThey have gotten their Standing Rock. We will do everything that is needed to stop thisย pipeline.โ€

Enbridge Energy argued they needed to replace the existing Line 3, which was built in the 1960s and is subject to corrosion and cracking. They currently operate it at half-capacity due to safety reasons. The company said they would continue running the existing unsafe pipeline if a replacement was not approved, The Associated Pressย reported.

Opponents, including the Minnesota Department of Commerce, said the Midwest didn’t need the additional oil from a pipeline replacement since demand will likely fall with the rise ofย electric vehiclesย andย renewable energy.

The commissioners seemed to have a hard time making the decisionโ€•chairwoman Nancy Langue wiped away tears as she explained her reasoningโ€•and emphasized concerns about the safety of the existing, olderย pipeline

โ€œIt’s irrefutable that that pipeline is an accident waiting to happen,โ€ Commissioner Dan Lipschultz said before the vote. โ€œIt feels like a gun to our head โ€ฆ All I can say is the gun is real and it’sย loaded.โ€

All five PUC members voted to approve the rebuild of the current pipeline, which stretches from Alberta, through North Dakota and Minnesota to Enbridge’s terminal in Wisconsin. Rebuilds have already finished in Wisconsin and begun in North Dakota andย Alberta.

The PUC also voted three to two to approve a modified version of Enbridge’s approved route, which will avoid two Native American reservations crossed by the existing pipeline but will cross land belonging to the Fond du Lac Band of Chippewa, though the PUC said the new route would depend on the Fond du Lac Band’sย agreement.

Tribal groups said Enbridge’s plan was the worst possible route and preferred a longer one that went further south, according toย Reuters.

Opponents will have 20 days from when the approval order is written to ask the PUC to reconsider its decision, somethingย White Earth Nationย lawyer Joe Plummer told Reuters is very likely. If the decision stands, opponents can then appeal to the Minnesota appealsย court.

RELATED:ย How Enbridge Helped Write Minnesota Pipeline Laws, Aiding Its Line 3 Battleย Today

Main image:ย A Line 3 protester with an Expect Resistance sign outside the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.ย Credit:ย Lorie Shaull,ย CC BYSAย 2.0

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.
on

The U.S. private equity firm KKR contributed to the presidentโ€™s swearing-in ceremony.

The U.S. private equity firm KKR contributed to the presidentโ€™s swearing-in ceremony.
on

Despite widespread public support for clean energy and climate action, Nigel Farageโ€™s party is running on an aggressively anti-net zero ticket.

Despite widespread public support for clean energy and climate action, Nigel Farageโ€™s party is running on an aggressively anti-net zero ticket.
on

Amit Forlit, who is accused of conducting hacking operations against 128 targets, faces up to 45 years behind bars if found guilty.

Amit Forlit, who is accused of conducting hacking operations against 128 targets, faces up to 45 years behind bars if found guilty.