Secretive Irish Climate Science Denier Group Steps Up 'Bizarre' Parliamentary Lobbying

authordefault
on

Climate denial group the Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) has significantly escalated its lobbying campaign to prevent climateย action.

The groupโ€™s main function until now has been to hold behind-closed-doors meetings with infamous climate science deniers as guest speakers. But it has now submitted a document to the Irish Parliament insisting climate change simply isnโ€™t as bad as scientists make out, DeSmog UK hasย learned.

The group, which has no publicly accessible membership or officer list, has run a series of โ€˜invitation-onlyโ€™ events in Dublin over the last 18 months allowing familiar faces from the world of climate denial, such as Richard Lindzen, William Happer, Henrik Svensmark and Nicola Scafetta to showcase their debunked arguments against taking action on climateย change.


Like what you’re reading? Donate here to support DeSmog UK‘s journalismย todayย 


Its seventh talk, which once again bars media and NGOs, takes place on Wednesday September 26 in Dublin, and features William van Wijngaarden, who is expected to make his oft-repeated claim that the greenhouse gas influence of agricultural emissions are โ€œsignificantly less than hitherto estimated by the IPCCโ€.

As a result of the strong recommendations arising from a Citizensโ€™ Assembly report on climate change issued late last year, the Irish parliament recently convened a Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate Action (JOCCA) to examine the Assemblyโ€™s findings and make recommendations for action toย government.

Ireland is one of the worst performing countries in the EU in terms of meeting its mandated obligations on emissions reduction, largely due to the lobbying power of key interest groups, including the agri-industrial and transport sectors. Instead of meeting its 2020 EU obligation to achieve a 20 percent cut in emissions versus a benchmark of 2005, Ireland is currently on track to achieve โ€œat mostโ€ a one percent emissions cut, according to Environmental Protection Agency estimates.

Submission

The ICSF submission to the JOCCA, which has been seen by DeSmog UK, runs to 25 pages and includes almost 100 references. None of the people whose names accompany the ICSF submission have relevant qualifications or expertise in climate science. No scientific advisors areย identified.

The document was submitted by the chairman of the ICSF, Jim Oโ€™Brien, a retired engineer. The submission was โ€˜supportedโ€™ by nine other named individuals, mainly retired engineers. They include Former Siemens and Science Foundation Ireland chairman Brian Sweeney and Dr Ed Walsh, former chair of the Irish Council for Science Technology andย Innovation.

The submission, entitled โ€˜Latest Climate Science, Sept 2018โ€™ is a mish mash of charts and graphics from a range of contrarian and denier sources, including the London-based Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and its references section is a whoโ€™s who of climate science denial, including John Christsy, Richard Lindzen, Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, William Happer, Matt Ridley and Willie Soon.

Among its claims are that current global temperature trends continue below IPCC model predictions and that โ€˜recent researchโ€™ shows lower climate sensitivity than estimated by the IPCC. The main source for the latter is retired meteorologist, Ray Bates, founder of the ICSF. It also quotes papers by Lindzen and Yong-Sang Choi which have been thoroughly debunked.

According to John Sweeney, Emeritus Professor at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research Unit, Maynooth University, the ICSF submission: โ€œcannot be taken seriously by any responsible atmosphericย scientistโ€.

He added that it: โ€œperpetuates long-debunked science, such as the non-existent temperature hiatus, the myth of discrepancies in thermometer observations and the spurious explanation of urban heat islands as the cause of higher temperatures onย landโ€.

Also commenting on the ICSF submission, Green Party senator, Grace Oโ€™Sullivan told DeSmog UK: โ€œit puts forward cherry picked data that does not represent either the consensus or the lived reality on any of these issues. They claim to be a sceptical group, checking the science. Yet every single conclusion on every single issue comes out against mitigation measures. Surely this is a bizarre and unlikelyย coincidence?โ€

Senator Oโ€™Sullivan added that she could not โ€œbegin to fathom the groupโ€™s true aims and motives, but these materials need to be viewed with the deepest โ€˜skepticismโ€™ themselvesโ€. She added that the work of the committee โ€œis too important to be set off course with distractions and misrepresentations such asย theseโ€.

DeSmog UK made numerous efforts to contact ICSF chair, Jim Oโ€™Brien, to ask him about the submission, as well as the funding and ongoing lobbying activities of the Forum, but he did not respond to an invitation toย comment.


Like what you’re reading? Donate here to support DeSmog UK‘s journalismย todayย 


Lobbying

Irelandโ€™sย Regulation of Lobbying Actย requires all individuals and groups engaged in lobbying to register and verify their details on theย Lobbying.ieย website and make written returns every fourย months. Environmental groups such as the Stop Climate Chaos coalition and An Taisce publish details of their lobbying returns as required, but nothing has been filed on behalf of the ICSF at the time ofย writing.

Under current regulations, groups engaged in lobbying must register if they have at least one paid employee. As it does not disclose any operational details publicly and has declined to answer questions from DeSmog, it is unclear whether or not the ICSF has any paid employees and if so, if it is required to register its lobbyingย activities.

The ICSF has recently launched its website, where it sets out its contrarian agenda plainly, attempting to claim the IPCC โ€˜got it wrongโ€™ on key issues. From there, it revisits debunked denier talking points, such as: โ€œthere are solar-related and other natural influences on earthโ€™s climateโ€ฆ the relative magnitudes of these influences may be comparable to or possibly even greater than those of GHG.โ€

โ€œICSF members do not foresee a planetary climate emergencyโ€, it continues. The organisation claims that its members are โ€œcharacterized by an open and enquiring mind on climate science, driven by the imperative of objectivity without any vestedย interestsโ€.

This open-mindedness does not extend to answering media questions, however. Its events have hand-picked attendees lists, the group has a secret membership and officer list, and there is no visible process for applying toย join.

It has also yet to explain how it has funded seven meetings involving international guest speakers. It claims to be โ€œmodestly self-funded through member contributionsย onlyโ€.

The ICSFโ€™s โ€˜Useful Linksโ€™ page gives an insight into its approach, in which legitimate sites such as the AMA and Climate Home are interspersed with denier blogs such as Watts Up With That and SEPP plus pseudoscience from Bjorn Lomborg. The ICSF chooses not to provide a link to the UNโ€™s official advisor on climate science, the IPCC.

Image: Jean Housen/Wikimedia Commons CC BYSA 3.0. Updated28/09/2018: The first two sentences of the ‘Lobbying’ section were updated forย clarity.

authordefault
John Gibbons is a Dublin-based specialist writer and commentator on climate and environmental issues. He blogs at ThinkOrSwim.ie. You can follow him on Twitterย @think_or_swim.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.

Taxpayers are on the hook as the bitumen extraction industry continues to play by its own rules.
on

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.

The utility is laundering strategic messaging about the energy transition through a partnership with The Atlantic's marketing team.
on

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.
on

Donor-advised funds offer big tax benefits and complete anonymity โ€” a growing cash source for groups promoting climate disinformation

Donor-advised funds offer big tax benefits and complete anonymity โ€” a growing cash source for groups promoting climate disinformation