Drilled: A Podcast on the Climate Crime of the Century

authordefault
on

By Climate Investigationsย Center

A newly released podcast, Drilled, โ€œinvestigates the crime of the century โ€” the creation of climateย denial.โ€

The eight part series takes listeners back in time to the inception of climate change denial. It tells the story of the special interests that launched campaigns against evolving climate science and the momentum created by this science, starting in the late 1980s and sustained through theย 2000s.

Guided by documents uncovered by reporters, academics, and activists in recent years, Drilled exposes the campaign of climate denial as a successful public relations endeavor undertaken by the fossil fuel industry andย allies.

The podcast utilizes primary source documents, such as internal corporate correspondence, leaked plans, government records, and interviews with former fossil fuel industry scientists to illuminate this little knownย history.

The collection of documents hosted on Climate Files and featured in Drilled outline a story of corporate knowledge and deceit. This history is critical in understanding why climate science has become a โ€œpoliticalโ€ issue today and the origin of denial rhetoric that permeates society today, right up to Presidentย Trump.

Interviewed for the podcast, Climate Investigations Centerโ€™s Kert Davies leads the listener through documents which illustrate corporate knowledge of climate science as early as the 1950s as well as industry campaigns to actively mislead the public.

As these documents show, some of the largest oil companies, including Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon, were studying the severity of climate change long before it became an issue most people were aware of and well before the policy arena started to take action in the lateย 1980s.

Read the Drilled documentsย yourself:

Highlights from Climate Investigations Center research and Climate Files that were covered inย Drilled:

Internal Shell Documents:

In 1998, Shell predicted an inevitable backlash, including climate liability lawsuits against โ€œfossil-fuel companies on the grounds of neglecting what scientists (including their own) have been saying for years,โ€ long before the first climate lawsuit was everย filed.

What Exxon Knew:

Illustrating their awareness of the risks posed by climate change, Exxonโ€™s own scientists suggested in 1981 โ€œit is distinctly possibleโ€ that climate change could โ€œproduce effects which will indeed be catastrophic,โ€ and despite that knowledge, the corporation for decades funded attempts to discredit the scientific consensus that their own research helpedย shape.

The Global Climate Coalition:

Exxon, not alone in its agenda, emphasized uncertainty with a suite of fossil-reliant corporations and trade associations by funding contrarian scientists, think tanks, and front groups that adopted the industryโ€™s support of fossil fuelย consumption.

The Global Climate Coalition (GCC), a prominent ringleader of 1990s corporate climate denial pressure, was a consortium of fossil fuel corporations and trade associations. Along with other groups, the GCC devoted extensive time, money and effort into changing the climateย narrative.

Contrary to the scientific certainty expressed internally by Exxonโ€™s scientists in the 1970โ€™s, in 1996, the GCC stated that there was โ€œno convincing evidence that future increases in greenhouse gas concentrations will produce significant climatic effects.โ€ The industry coalition actively worked to derail international climate negotiations, oppose action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote the views of climate skeptics.

Trade Association Denial Campaigns:

Knowledge of additional industry funded climate denial is extensive. A trail of documents such as the American Petroleum Instituteโ€™s 1998 leaked โ€œGlobal Climate Science Communications Planโ€ and the Edison Electric Instituteโ€™s half a million dollar denial โ€œInformation Council on the Environmentโ€ (ICE) campaign in 1991 detail industry attempts to derail public faith in climate science and expose a history corporations now wish they could makeย disappear.

Willie Soon investigation:

Receiving over a million dollars from fossil fuel entities, Willie Soon is one of the most blatant examples of a climate denying scientist being paid by industry interests up until a few yearsย ago.

Fred Palmer:

Fred Palmer, a career climate denier, ran the โ€œICEโ€ campaign while at the Western Fuels Association, a consortium of coal utilities and suppliers. He later worked as Peabody Coalโ€™s Senior Vice President for Government Relations, before joining the climate denying Heartland Institute where he runs their coal campaign. Palmer once said โ€œevery time you turn your car on, and you burn fossil fuels, and you put CO2 in the air, you are doing the work of the Lord.โ€ a sentiment he has expressed repeatedly.

Listen to the podcast Drilled forย yourself.

The impacts of climate change we are seeing today are happening faster than scientists predicted one or two decades ago. These consequences are too profound to allow the history of who has held us back from solving this crisis to slip silently into the past. Drilled is one step forward in remembering this history, keeping it alive in our consciousness as we look ahead to charting a betterย future.

Find it on Itunes, Spotify, or anywhere else you streamย podcasts.

Originally posted onย Climate Investigations Center.

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.
on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.