Newly Elected DR Congo Government Urged to End Oil Company's Contract to Drill in Protected Park

authordefault
on

A part-UK owned company could be prevented from drilling in a World Heritage site in the Democratic Republic of Congo after questions were raised over the legality of itsย contract.

The Compagnie Miniere Congolaise SPRL, or CoMiCo, a company with an opaque offshore structure partly owned by a Guernsey-registered firm, was awarded the rights to an oil bloc that encroaches on the protected Salonga National Park, the worldโ€™s second largest tropical rainforest and home to a number of endangered species.

Although the parkโ€™s World Heritage site status should in theory protect the area from oil exploration and other extractive activities, confidential documents leaked last year showed the Congolese government was working to redraw the boundaries of the Salonga national park to remove protected status from certainย areas.

However, the CoMiCo contract, which was recently made public, could be invalid according to an analysis by NGO Global Witness, which found the contract was not in line with DR Congoโ€™s latest petroleumย legislation.

Theย contract

CoMiCoโ€™s contract was first signed in 2007 but was only approved by a Presidential ruling in February 2018, when it was due to come intoย force.

In 2015, DR Congo approved a new law that aimed to ensure the country was adequately benefiting from the proceeds of its growing oil sector. This law includes a clause that makes any contracts that do not respect the latest regulationsย void.

Following a legal assessment, Global Witness found that the contract is not in line on issues such as area tax, royalty rates and exploration license renewals with the 2015 legislation โ€” giving a fiscal advantage to CoMiCo. It concluded that by approving CoMiCoโ€™s contract without amending it to conform to the updated 2015 law, the contract could be consideredย invalid.

โ€œAny attempt to go ahead under this contract would set a dangerous precedent as the government appears to have disregarded its own laws,โ€ said Peter Jones, of Globalย Witness.

CoMiCoโ€™s lawyer rejected Global Witnessโ€™ analysis of the contractโ€™s terms and called its ย interpretation โ€œclearly wrongโ€, however. He added that a stabilisation clause allowed the contract to take effect โ€œwith respect to the conditions in force as ofย 2007โ€.

The lawyer previously said the company had โ€œno intention to drill within the boundaries of the nationalย parkโ€.

A long-awaited and contested presidential election has recently put the spotlight on the DR Congo. Felix Tshisekedi was announced winner and is due to succeed outgoing President Joseph Kabila, who has been in power sinceย 2001.

Global Witness has called on Tshisekedi to ensure extractive companies are respecting the countriesโ€™ law and urged the new Congolese government to review CoMiCoโ€™s contract in light of its findings. It also called on the new government to put an end to the preparation work which could see oil-rich areas of the Salonga park be de-classified from the protected status and opened up forย drilling.

A company shrouded inย secrecy

Concerns have also been raised over the secrecy surrounding the ownership ofย CoMiCo.

The company is registered at an address in Kinshasa, DR Congo, but its beneficial owners and financial backers remain largely unknown because of a complex offshore company structure involving shell companies and nominee accounts.

Global Witness previously established that Guernsey-registered Central Oil and Gas held a 40 percent stake in CoMiCo. The ownership of the remaining 60 percent remainsย unknown.

CoMiCoโ€™s 2007 contract shows the company was represented by Montfort Konzi, a former Congolese politician and a member of the Movement for the Liberation of the Congo, and Idalรฉcio de Castro Rodrigues Oliveira, a Portuguese businessman who has been accused of corruption charges by Brazilian authorities in relation to โ€œOperation Car Washโ€ โ€” one of the biggest corruption scandals inย history.

As chief executive of the Lusitania Group, De Oliveira purchased oil licenses in West Africa in 2011 and entered into a partnership with Petrobras, Brazilโ€™s oil giant which is at the heart of the countryโ€™s corruption probe. CoMiCoโ€™s lawyer said De Oliveira was not a company shareholder and that โ€œnone of the other beneficial owners have been convicted of bribery, corruption, fraud or other financialย crimeโ€.

However, the secrecy of CoMiCoโ€™s real owners coupled with the potential involvement of Konzi, a politically exposed person, raises significant accountability questions, according to Globalย Witness.

Although there is nothing illegal about setting up complex company structures offshore to hide who the beneficial owners of a company are, the Panama and Paradise Papers scandals have previously exposed the way in which the secrecy of the offshore system has been used to hide corruption, bribery andย fraud.

Image credit: Max Pixel CC0

Related Posts

on

A Peterson Academy lecture by Marian Tupy frames notorious killers as โ€˜extreme environmentalistsโ€™ who want to reduce Earthโ€™s population.

A Peterson Academy lecture by Marian Tupy frames notorious killers as โ€˜extreme environmentalistsโ€™ who want to reduce Earthโ€™s population.
on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.