NOAA Directed Staffers Not to Contradict Trump on Misleading Dorian Claims

authordefault
on

Byย Olivia Rosane, EcoWatch. Reposted with permission from EcoWatch.

Can the U.S. under Presidentย Donald Trumpย still trust government-issued weatherย reports?

That’s the question at the heart of a Saturday report fromย The Washington Postย that leadership at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) directed staff not to contradict Trump’s claims thatย Hurricane Dorianย would impactย Alabama.

The controversy began Sept. 1 when Trump sent a tweet listing Alabama among the states that what would โ€œlikely be hit (much) harder than anticipatedโ€ by the approachingย hurricane, asย HuffPost reported.

But Alabama was not in the National Hurricane Center’s โ€œcone of uncertainty,โ€ which meteorologists use to predict a storm’s likely path, The Washington Post explained. Trump’s tweet prompted concerned residents to call the Birmingham, Alabama office of the National Weather Service (NWS), which is operated by NOAA. In response, the Birmingham NWS tweeted that Alabama would โ€œNOT see any impactsโ€ from theย hurricane.

After both tweets were posted, NOAA sent an email to NWS staff instructing them to โ€œonly stick with official National Hurricane Center forecasts if questions arise from some national level social media posts which hit the news thisย afternoon.โ€

They were also told not to โ€œprovide any opinion,โ€ according to the email obtained by The Washingtonย Post.

NWS staff received a similar email on Sept. 4, after Trump displayed an Aug. 29 forecast map during a White House briefing that had been altered with a black marker to include Alabama in the cone ofย uncertainty.

โ€œThis is the first time I’ve felt pressure from above to not say what truly is the forecast,โ€ an anonymous NOAA meteorologist told The Washington Post. โ€œIt’s hard for me to wrap my head around. One of the things we train on is to dispel inaccurate rumors and ultimately that is what was occurring โ€” ultimately what the Alabama office did is provide a forecast with their tweet, that is what they get paid toย do.โ€

The Washington Post report came a day after NOAA issued an unsigned statement supporting the President’s claims that Dorian would impact Alabama, asย NPR reported.

โ€œThe Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time,โ€ the statementย said.

โ€œSome administrator, or someone at the top of NOAA, threw the National Weather Service under the bus,โ€ University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy told NPR.

A NOAA official told The Washington Post there was no โ€œpolitical motivationโ€ behind Friday’s statement, and that it had been issued because a NOAA forecast had shown a five to 10 percent chance that tropical storm force winds would hit a small part of Alabama. However, such winds rarely cause enough damage to warrant advance preparation, The Washington Post pointedย out.

Oklahoma University meteorology professor Jason Furtado toldย The Associated Pressย that NOAA‘s statement and the president’s tweets could erode confidence inย meteorologists.

โ€œThe job just got harder because of this issue,โ€ heย said.

Main image: President Trump gives updates about the forecast of Hurricane Dorian on September 4. Credit: The White House Twitter, publicย domain

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.